From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 28/29] bpf: refactor bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data to use helper number
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 12:11:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241220171130.511389-28-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241220171130.511389-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
[ Upstream commit b238e187b4a2d3b54d80aec05a9cab6466b79dde ]
Use BPF helper number instead of function pointer in
bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(). This would simplify usage of this
function in verifier.c:check_cfg() (in a follow-up patch),
where only helper number is easily available and there is no real need
to lookup helper proto.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210041100.1898468-3-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 1a4607ffba35 ("bpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/filter.h | 2 +-
kernel/bpf/core.c | 2 +-
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +-
net/core/filter.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index 7d7578a8eac1..5118caf8aa1c 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_arena(void);
bool bpf_jit_supports_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn, bool in_arena);
u64 bpf_arch_uaddress_limit(void);
void arch_bpf_stack_walk(bool (*consume_fn)(void *cookie, u64 ip, u64 sp, u64 bp), void *cookie);
-bool bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(void *func);
+bool bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(enum bpf_func_id func_id);
static inline bool bpf_dump_raw_ok(const struct cred *cred)
{
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 3af5f42ea791..2b9c8c168a0b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -2940,7 +2940,7 @@ void __weak bpf_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
}
-bool __weak bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(void *func)
+bool __weak bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
{
return false;
}
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index b2008076df9c..71575f83860b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -10519,7 +10519,7 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
}
/* With LD_ABS/IND some JITs save/restore skb from r1. */
- changes_data = bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(fn->func);
+ changes_data = bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(func_id);
if (changes_data && fn->arg1_type != ARG_PTR_TO_CTX) {
verbose(env, "kernel subsystem misconfigured func %s#%d: r1 != ctx\n",
func_id_name(func_id), func_id);
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 9a459213d283..33125317994e 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -7909,42 +7909,35 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_tcp_raw_check_syncookie_ipv6_proto = {
#endif /* CONFIG_INET */
-bool bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(void *func)
-{
- if (func == bpf_skb_vlan_push ||
- func == bpf_skb_vlan_pop ||
- func == bpf_skb_store_bytes ||
- func == bpf_skb_change_proto ||
- func == bpf_skb_change_head ||
- func == sk_skb_change_head ||
- func == bpf_skb_change_tail ||
- func == sk_skb_change_tail ||
- func == bpf_skb_adjust_room ||
- func == sk_skb_adjust_room ||
- func == bpf_skb_pull_data ||
- func == sk_skb_pull_data ||
- func == bpf_clone_redirect ||
- func == bpf_l3_csum_replace ||
- func == bpf_l4_csum_replace ||
- func == bpf_xdp_adjust_head ||
- func == bpf_xdp_adjust_meta ||
- func == bpf_msg_pull_data ||
- func == bpf_msg_push_data ||
- func == bpf_msg_pop_data ||
- func == bpf_xdp_adjust_tail ||
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_BPF)
- func == bpf_lwt_seg6_store_bytes ||
- func == bpf_lwt_seg6_adjust_srh ||
- func == bpf_lwt_seg6_action ||
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_INET
- func == bpf_sock_ops_store_hdr_opt ||
-#endif
- func == bpf_lwt_in_push_encap ||
- func == bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap)
+bool bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
+{
+ switch (func_id) {
+ case BPF_FUNC_clone_redirect:
+ case BPF_FUNC_l3_csum_replace:
+ case BPF_FUNC_l4_csum_replace:
+ case BPF_FUNC_lwt_push_encap:
+ case BPF_FUNC_lwt_seg6_action:
+ case BPF_FUNC_lwt_seg6_adjust_srh:
+ case BPF_FUNC_lwt_seg6_store_bytes:
+ case BPF_FUNC_msg_pop_data:
+ case BPF_FUNC_msg_pull_data:
+ case BPF_FUNC_msg_push_data:
+ case BPF_FUNC_skb_adjust_room:
+ case BPF_FUNC_skb_change_head:
+ case BPF_FUNC_skb_change_proto:
+ case BPF_FUNC_skb_change_tail:
+ case BPF_FUNC_skb_pull_data:
+ case BPF_FUNC_skb_store_bytes:
+ case BPF_FUNC_skb_vlan_pop:
+ case BPF_FUNC_skb_vlan_push:
+ case BPF_FUNC_store_hdr_opt:
+ case BPF_FUNC_xdp_adjust_head:
+ case BPF_FUNC_xdp_adjust_meta:
+ case BPF_FUNC_xdp_adjust_tail:
return true;
-
- return false;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
}
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_event_output_data_proto __weak;
--
2.39.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-20 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20241220171130.511389-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2024-12-20 17:11 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 24/29] net: usb: qmi_wwan: add Telit FE910C04 compositions Sasha Levin
2024-12-20 17:11 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 25/29] Bluetooth: hci_core: Fix sleeping function called from invalid context Sasha Levin
2024-12-20 17:11 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2024-12-20 17:11 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 29/29] bpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241220171130.511389-28-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).