netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Soham Chakradeo <sohamch.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Soham Chakradeo <sohamch@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests/net: packetdrill: import multiple tests
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 10:41:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241227104130.78b4a961@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <676ada6afb03_a069c294d6@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>

On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 10:59:38 -0500 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > > Thanks. It does not seem to resolve the flakes.
> > > 
> > > At this point I think the best path is to run them in debug mode to
> > > get coverage, but ignore errors. With the below draft patch, error
> > > output is still logged. For instance:
> > > 
> > > # tcp_timestamping_partial.pkt:58: runtime error in recvmsg call: Bad timestamp 0 in scm_timestamping 0: expected=1734924748967958 (20000) actual=1734924748982069 (34111) start=1734924748947958
> > > # ok 2 ipv6 # SKIP  
> > 
> > Makes sense. Can we make this XFAIL instead of SKIP, tho?
> > Not exactly accurate but we try to use SKIP for reporting env / setup
> > problems like missing commands. We have FAIL_TO_XFAIL and
> > xfail_on_slow() in the lib for netdev bash tests, already.  
> 
> Sounds good. I'll add a ktap_test_xfail() to stay with that API.
> I see no clean way to make use of xfail_on_slow directly.

Ack.

> When net-next reopens, unless the noisy dash is annoying.

No huge rush, once we mark the test as ignored it's not very annoying.
As long as we have a fix before the next merge window we'll be good.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-27 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-17 18:51 [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests/net: packetdrill: import multiple tests Soham Chakradeo
2024-12-17 18:51 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] selftests/net: packetdrill: import tcp/ecn, tcp/close, tcp/sack, tcp/tcp_info Soham Chakradeo
2024-12-17 18:51 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] selftests/net: packetdrill: import tcp/fast_recovery, tcp/nagle, tcp/timestamping Soham Chakradeo
2024-12-17 18:52 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] selftests/net: packetdrill: import tcp/eor, tcp/splice, tcp/ts_recent, tcp/blocking Soham Chakradeo
2024-12-17 18:52 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] selftests/net: packetdrill: import tcp/user_timeout, tcp/validate, tcp/sendfile, tcp/limited-transmit, tcp/syscall_bad_arg Soham Chakradeo
2024-12-18 18:00 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests/net: packetdrill: import multiple tests Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-18 19:43   ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-12-19  8:54   ` Paolo Abeni
2024-12-19 19:31     ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-12-20  2:01       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-23  3:46         ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-12-23 16:50           ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-24 15:59             ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-12-27 18:41               ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-12-18 18:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241227104130.78b4a961@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sohamch.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=sohamch@google.com \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).