netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@engleder-embedded.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
	przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, bhelgaas@google.com, pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de,
	aleksander.lobakin@intel.com, Gerhard Engleder <eg@keba.com>,
	Vitaly Lifshits <vitaly.lifshits@intel.com>,
	Avigail Dahan <avigailx.dahan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v4] e1000e: Fix real-time violations on link up
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 11:17:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250106111752.GC4068@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241219192743.4499-1-gerhard@engleder-embedded.com>

On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 08:27:43PM +0100, Gerhard Engleder wrote:
> From: Gerhard Engleder <eg@keba.com>
> 
> Link down and up triggers update of MTA table. This update executes many
> PCIe writes and a final flush. Thus, PCIe will be blocked until all
> writes are flushed. As a result, DMA transfers of other targets suffer
> from delay in the range of 50us. This results in timing violations on
> real-time systems during link down and up of e1000e in combination with
> an Intel i3-2310E Sandy Bridge CPU.
> 
> The i3-2310E is quite old. Launched 2011 by Intel but still in use as
> robot controller. The exact root cause of the problem is unclear and
> this situation won't change as Intel support for this CPU has ended
> years ago. Our experience is that the number of posted PCIe writes needs
> to be limited at least for real-time systems. With posted PCIe writes a
> much higher throughput can be generated than with PCIe reads which
> cannot be posted. Thus, the load on the interconnect is much higher.
> Additionally, a PCIe read waits until all posted PCIe writes are done.
> Therefore, the PCIe read can block the CPU for much more than 10us if a
> lot of PCIe writes were posted before. Both issues are the reason why we
> are limiting the number of posted PCIe writes in row in general for our
> real-time systems, not only for this driver.
> 
> A flush after a low enough number of posted PCIe writes eliminates the
> delay but also increases the time needed for MTA table update. The
> following measurements were done on i3-2310E with e1000e for 128 MTA
> table entries:
> 
> Single flush after all writes: 106us
> Flush after every write:       429us
> Flush after every 2nd write:   266us
> Flush after every 4th write:   180us
> Flush after every 8th write:   141us
> Flush after every 16th write:  121us
> 
> A flush after every 8th write delays the link up by 35us and the
> negative impact to DMA transfers of other targets is still tolerable.
> 
> Execute a flush after every 8th write. This prevents overloading the
> interconnect with posted writes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gerhard Engleder <eg@keba.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/f8fe665a-5e6c-4f95-b47a-2f3281aa0e6c@lunn.ch/T/
> CC: Vitaly Lifshits <vitaly.lifshits@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Avigail Dahan <avigailx.dahan@intel.com>
> ---
> v4:
> - add PREEMPT_RT dependency again (Vitaly Lifshits)
> - fix comment styple (Alexander Lobakin)
> - add to comment each 8th and explain why (Alexander Lobakin)
> - simplify check for every 8th write (Alexander Lobakin)
> 
> v3:
> - mention problematic platform explicitly (Bjorn Helgaas)
> - improve comment (Paul Menzel)
> 
> v2:
> - remove PREEMPT_RT dependency (Andrew Lunn, Przemek Kitszel)

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-06 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-19 19:27 [PATCH iwl-next v4] e1000e: Fix real-time violations on link up Gerhard Engleder
2024-12-22  8:49 ` Lifshits, Vitaly
2025-01-06 11:17 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-02-04 20:18   ` Gerhard Engleder
2025-02-04 21:21     ` Tony Nguyen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250106111752.GC4068@kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=avigailx.dahan@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eg@keba.com \
    --cc=gerhard@engleder-embedded.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=vitaly.lifshits@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).