From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F14081DFE2F for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2025 20:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736196812; cv=none; b=Gz0+UikF3QOVdwexJhUG+SEsITqT4nLrP+kw6OW09UN2vG0MSms8GG7YdTqyjq4J9kzTsj1NMqv5IT1SDQ9HKi8J+VPXK4jzEpzzQjV/UgDOqyQW4/X4lAQl8h7Q2vv/JI8wxjdqs9OjnCz9Iq/INJvgBsfSxBfj0gpKt6gkTE8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736196812; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MoYa4aZxKNP6PTyxdo5P0igvYdQEyUdFKxCQROmGscc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=czBoFHOWJzmUcHqpU5dp4pt0cQWgxVqcSXPDdViZxZ0727qIAQ5l6C+cYRCU0Xx9Ym2P0zr2MNrYh3+g5Vp0wDXiPh4nDf+91GKDTzLIxW7plmn0HAYXFazIuKk0suHDDx0DbJ9iPPRGmcEtWnEBWWh7dD4aSV+pYm/OwhTxLAo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=PLagySuD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PLagySuD" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C923C4CED2; Mon, 6 Jan 2025 20:53:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1736196811; bh=MoYa4aZxKNP6PTyxdo5P0igvYdQEyUdFKxCQROmGscc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PLagySuDigDXTRefnGo3zvG8/JndZ7iFdXcNvlj167ueZAxpBxddDk2tJPxHpwx3h Nmmgx7o8e2TfFjN+Yef1NAfwlVlsqLo2MmEoTX5VGy4gDb0FXyrgx735HZPopI50xL GfUt4htN+tQURtyjNS+Vlra95fqYETnl08GGNNnXvFTEY1rkFlaBWViOrE0Psv24GM U4FWpYklqikk6mAvPhbdKh5cmT8d4Fic/mtTdh98ktnwWrZGhl4C3bzB0nlSWffnVs AdXmtcWoQDOUUTIVlqanRsVH19MRqvU62cly9VNxvfew7M2u1qG5WOQyxkutW0ddI3 /6RomMmXdwopg== Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 12:53:30 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Sai Krishna Gajula Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v8 4/6] octeontx2-pf: CN20K mbox REQ/ACK implementation for NIC PF Message-ID: <20250106125330.15cf523b@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250105071554.735144-1-saikrishnag@marvell.com> <20250105071554.735144-5-saikrishnag@marvell.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 13:08:29 +0000 Sai Krishna Gajula wrote: > I have pushed V8 patchset for CN20k mbox module yesterday, as the > previous version got deferred due to winter holidays. > > We see below warning/error message for patch 4 when compiled with > clang options. "netdev/build_clang fail Errors and > warnings before: 162 this patch: 163" It's a known problem :( Unfortunately one of the core headers (linux/mm.h, IIRC) generates a warning when build with latest clang, so we get false positive failures. Hopefully this will be fixed during the 6.14 merge window. If your patches are still in an active state in patchwork no action is required on your side. Adding back the list, please avoid removing CCs.