netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
To: kgraul@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	martin.lau@linux.dev, pabeni@redhat.com, song@kernel.org,
	sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, yhs@fb.com,
	edumazet@google.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	kpsingh@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, guwen@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/5] net/smc: bpf: register smc_ops info struct_ops
Date: Tue,  7 Jan 2025 12:17:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250107041715.98342-4-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250107041715.98342-1-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>

To implement injection capability for smc via struct_ops, so that
user can make their own smc_ops to modify the behavior of smc stack.

Currently, user can write their own implememtion to choose whether to
use SMC or not before TCP 3rd handshake to be comleted. In the future,
users can implement more complex functions on smc by expanding it.

Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 net/smc/af_smc.c  | 10 ++++++
 net/smc/smc_ops.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 net/smc/smc_ops.h |  5 +++
 3 files changed, 94 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index 9d76e902fd77..6adedae2986d 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
 #include "smc_sysctl.h"
 #include "smc_loopback.h"
 #include "smc_inet.h"
+#include "smc_ops.h"
 
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(smc_server_lgr_pending);	/* serialize link group
 						 * creation on server
@@ -3576,8 +3577,17 @@ static int __init smc_init(void)
 		pr_err("%s: smc_inet_init fails with %d\n", __func__, rc);
 		goto out_ulp;
 	}
+
+	rc = smc_bpf_struct_ops_init();
+	if (rc) {
+		pr_err("%s: smc_bpf_struct_ops_init fails with %d\n", __func__, rc);
+		goto out_inet;
+	}
+
 	static_branch_enable(&tcp_have_smc);
 	return 0;
+out_inet:
+	smc_inet_exit();
 out_ulp:
 	tcp_unregister_ulp(&smc_ulp_ops);
 out_lo:
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_ops.c b/net/smc/smc_ops.c
index 0fc19cadd760..67b6b2b92771 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_ops.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_ops.c
@@ -10,6 +10,10 @@
  *  Author: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
  */
 
+#include <linux/bpf_verifier.h>
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <linux/btf.h>
+
 #include "smc_ops.h"
 
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(smc_ops_list_lock);
@@ -49,3 +53,78 @@ struct smc_ops *smc_ops_find_by_name(const char *name)
 	}
 	return NULL;
 }
+
+static int __bpf_smc_stub_set_tcp_option(struct tcp_sock *tp) { return 1; }
+static int __bpf_smc_stub_set_tcp_option_cond(const struct tcp_sock *tp,
+					      struct inet_request_sock *ireq)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static struct smc_ops __bpf_smc_bpf_ops = {
+	.set_option		= __bpf_smc_stub_set_tcp_option,
+	.set_option_cond	= __bpf_smc_stub_set_tcp_option_cond,
+};
+
+static int smc_bpf_ops_init(struct btf *btf) { return 0; }
+
+static int smc_bpf_ops_reg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
+{
+	return smc_ops_reg(kdata);
+}
+
+static void smc_bpf_ops_unreg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
+{
+	smc_ops_unreg(kdata);
+}
+
+static int smc_bpf_ops_init_member(const struct btf_type *t,
+				   const struct btf_member *member,
+				   void *kdata, const void *udata)
+{
+	const struct smc_ops *u_ops;
+	struct smc_ops *k_ops;
+	u32 moff;
+
+	u_ops = (const struct smc_ops *)udata;
+	k_ops = (struct smc_ops *)kdata;
+
+	moff = __btf_member_bit_offset(t, member) / 8;
+	switch (moff) {
+	case offsetof(struct smc_ops, name):
+		if (bpf_obj_name_cpy(k_ops->name, u_ops->name,
+				     sizeof(u_ops->name)) <= 0)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		return 1;
+	case offsetof(struct smc_ops, flags):
+		if (u_ops->flags & ~SMC_OPS_ALL_FLAGS)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		k_ops->flags = u_ops->flags;
+		return 1;
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct bpf_verifier_ops smc_bpf_verifier_ops = {
+	.get_func_proto		= bpf_base_func_proto,
+	.is_valid_access	= bpf_tracing_btf_ctx_access,
+};
+
+static struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_smc_bpf_ops = {
+	.name		= "smc_ops",
+	.init		= smc_bpf_ops_init,
+	.reg		= smc_bpf_ops_reg,
+	.unreg		= smc_bpf_ops_unreg,
+	.cfi_stubs	= &__bpf_smc_bpf_ops,
+	.verifier_ops	= &smc_bpf_verifier_ops,
+	.init_member	= smc_bpf_ops_init_member,
+	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
+int smc_bpf_struct_ops_init(void)
+{
+	return register_bpf_struct_ops(&bpf_smc_bpf_ops, smc_ops);
+}
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_ops.h b/net/smc/smc_ops.h
index 4b33dc2d65b9..06dc30363a83 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_ops.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_ops.h
@@ -21,5 +21,10 @@
  * Note: Caller MUST ensure it's was invoked under rcu_read_lock.
  */
 struct smc_ops *smc_ops_find_by_name(const char *name);
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_OPS)
+int smc_bpf_struct_ops_init(void);
+#else
+static inline int smc_bpf_struct_ops_init(void) { return 0; }
+#endif
 
 #endif /* __SMC_OPS */
-- 
2.45.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-07  4:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-07  4:17 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/5] net/smc: Introduce smc_ops D. Wythe
2025-01-07  4:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/5] bpf: export necessary sympols for modules with struct_ops D. Wythe
2025-01-07  4:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/5] net/smc: Introduce generic hook smc_ops D. Wythe
2025-01-13 11:40   ` Dust Li
2025-01-14  9:42     ` D. Wythe
2025-01-13 11:49   ` Dust Li
2025-01-14  9:51     ` D. Wythe
2025-01-07  4:17 ` D. Wythe [this message]
2025-01-07  4:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/5] libbpf: fix error when st-prefix_ops and ops from differ btf D. Wythe
2025-01-07  4:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/5] bpf/selftests: add selftest for bpf_smc_ops D. Wythe
2025-01-08  0:48   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-08 13:56     ` D. Wythe
2025-01-07  5:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/5] net/smc: Introduce smc_ops D. Wythe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250107041715.98342-4-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).