From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/4] net: no longer assume RTNL is held in flush_all_backlogs()
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 16:22:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250108162255.1306392-3-edumazet@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250108162255.1306392-1-edumazet@google.com>
flush_all_backlogs() uses per-cpu and static data to hold its
temporary data, on the assumption it is called under RTNL
protection.
Following patch in the series will break this assumption.
Use instead a dynamically allocated piece of memory.
In the unlikely case the allocation fails,
use a boot-time allocated memory.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
net/core/dev.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 76ad68b129eed0407686e8696102aeed9a8b30ec..8ff288cf25dceb5856496388f83f409fcb6f8e5d 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5978,8 +5978,6 @@ void netif_receive_skb_list(struct list_head *head)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_receive_skb_list);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct work_struct, flush_works);
-
/* Network device is going away, flush any packets still pending */
static void flush_backlog(struct work_struct *work)
{
@@ -6036,36 +6034,54 @@ static bool flush_required(int cpu)
return true;
}
+struct flush_backlogs {
+ cpumask_t flush_cpus;
+ struct work_struct w[];
+};
+
+static struct flush_backlogs *flush_backlogs_alloc(void)
+{
+ return kmalloc(struct_size_t(struct flush_backlogs, w, nr_cpu_ids),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+}
+
+static struct flush_backlogs *flush_backlogs_fallback;
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(flush_backlogs_mutex);
+
static void flush_all_backlogs(void)
{
- static cpumask_t flush_cpus;
+ struct flush_backlogs *ptr = flush_backlogs_alloc();
unsigned int cpu;
- /* since we are under rtnl lock protection we can use static data
- * for the cpumask and avoid allocating on stack the possibly
- * large mask
- */
- ASSERT_RTNL();
+ if (!ptr) {
+ mutex_lock(&flush_backlogs_mutex);
+ ptr = flush_backlogs_fallback;
+ }
+ cpumask_clear(&ptr->flush_cpus);
cpus_read_lock();
- cpumask_clear(&flush_cpus);
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
if (flush_required(cpu)) {
- queue_work_on(cpu, system_highpri_wq,
- per_cpu_ptr(&flush_works, cpu));
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &flush_cpus);
+ INIT_WORK(&ptr->w[cpu], flush_backlog);
+ queue_work_on(cpu, system_highpri_wq, &ptr->w[cpu]);
+ __cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &ptr->flush_cpus);
}
}
/* we can have in flight packet[s] on the cpus we are not flushing,
* synchronize_net() in unregister_netdevice_many() will take care of
- * them
+ * them.
*/
- for_each_cpu(cpu, &flush_cpus)
- flush_work(per_cpu_ptr(&flush_works, cpu));
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, &ptr->flush_cpus)
+ flush_work(&ptr->w[cpu]);
cpus_read_unlock();
+
+ if (ptr != flush_backlogs_fallback)
+ kfree(ptr);
+ else
+ mutex_unlock(&flush_backlogs_mutex);
}
static void net_rps_send_ipi(struct softnet_data *remsd)
@@ -12259,12 +12275,13 @@ static int __init net_dev_init(void)
* Initialise the packet receive queues.
*/
+ flush_backlogs_fallback = flush_backlogs_alloc();
+ if (!flush_backlogs_fallback)
+ goto out;
+
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
- struct work_struct *flush = per_cpu_ptr(&flush_works, i);
struct softnet_data *sd = &per_cpu(softnet_data, i);
- INIT_WORK(flush, flush_backlog);
-
skb_queue_head_init(&sd->input_pkt_queue);
skb_queue_head_init(&sd->process_queue);
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD
--
2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-08 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-08 16:22 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/4] net: reduce RTNL pressure in unregister_netdevice() Eric Dumazet
2025-01-08 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/4] net: expedite synchronize_net() for cleanup_net() Eric Dumazet
2025-01-09 14:35 ` kernel test robot
2025-01-09 15:10 ` kernel test robot
2025-01-08 16:22 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2025-01-08 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 3/4] net: no longer hold RTNL while calling flush_all_backlogs() Eric Dumazet
2025-01-08 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 4/4] net: reduce RTNL hold duration in unregister_netdevice_many_notify() Eric Dumazet
2025-01-08 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 0/4] net: reduce RTNL pressure in unregister_netdevice() Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250108162255.1306392-3-edumazet@google.com \
--to=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).