* [PATCH] Bluetooth: L2CAP: handle NULL sock pointer in l2cap_sock_alloc
@ 2024-12-17 21:19 Fedor Pchelkin
2024-12-21 8:17 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Fedor Pchelkin @ 2024-12-17 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz, Jakub Kicinski
Cc: Fedor Pchelkin, Johan Hedberg, Marcel Holtmann, Ignat Korchagin,
Kuniyuki Iwashima, Eric Dumazet, linux-bluetooth, linux-kernel,
lvc-project, netdev, stable
A NULL sock pointer is passed into l2cap_sock_alloc() when it is called
from l2cap_sock_new_connection_cb() and the error handling paths should
also be aware of it.
Seemingly a more elegant solution would be to swap bt_sock_alloc() and
l2cap_chan_create() calls since they are not interdependent to that moment
but then l2cap_chan_create() adds the soon to be deallocated and still
dummy-initialized channel to the global list accessible by many L2CAP
paths. The channel would be removed from the list in short period of time
but be a bit more straight-forward here and just check for NULL instead of
changing the order of function calls.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE static
analysis tool.
Fixes: 7c4f78cdb8e7 ("Bluetooth: L2CAP: do not leave dangling sk pointer on error in l2cap_sock_create()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru>
---
net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
index 3d2553dcdb1b..49f97d4138ea 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
@@ -1888,7 +1888,8 @@ static struct sock *l2cap_sock_alloc(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
chan = l2cap_chan_create();
if (!chan) {
sk_free(sk);
- sock->sk = NULL;
+ if (sock)
+ sock->sk = NULL;
return NULL;
}
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: L2CAP: handle NULL sock pointer in l2cap_sock_alloc
2024-12-17 21:19 [PATCH] Bluetooth: L2CAP: handle NULL sock pointer in l2cap_sock_alloc Fedor Pchelkin
@ 2024-12-21 8:17 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-09 7:47 ` Fedor Pchelkin
2025-01-09 16:16 ` patchwork-bot+bluetooth
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima @ 2024-12-21 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pchelkin
Cc: edumazet, ignat, johan.hedberg, kuba, kuniyu, linux-bluetooth,
linux-kernel, luiz.dentz, lvc-project, marcel, netdev, stable
From: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:19:59 +0300
> A NULL sock pointer is passed into l2cap_sock_alloc() when it is called
> from l2cap_sock_new_connection_cb() and the error handling paths should
> also be aware of it.
>
> Seemingly a more elegant solution would be to swap bt_sock_alloc() and
> l2cap_chan_create() calls since they are not interdependent to that moment
> but then l2cap_chan_create() adds the soon to be deallocated and still
> dummy-initialized channel to the global list accessible by many L2CAP
> paths. The channel would be removed from the list in short period of time
> but be a bit more straight-forward here and just check for NULL instead of
> changing the order of function calls.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE static
> analysis tool.
>
> Fixes: 7c4f78cdb8e7 ("Bluetooth: L2CAP: do not leave dangling sk pointer on error in l2cap_sock_create()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
> ---
> net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
> index 3d2553dcdb1b..49f97d4138ea 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
> @@ -1888,7 +1888,8 @@ static struct sock *l2cap_sock_alloc(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
> chan = l2cap_chan_create();
> if (!chan) {
> sk_free(sk);
> - sock->sk = NULL;
> + if (sock)
> + sock->sk = NULL;
> return NULL;
> }
>
> --
> 2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: L2CAP: handle NULL sock pointer in l2cap_sock_alloc
2024-12-17 21:19 [PATCH] Bluetooth: L2CAP: handle NULL sock pointer in l2cap_sock_alloc Fedor Pchelkin
2024-12-21 8:17 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
@ 2025-01-09 7:47 ` Fedor Pchelkin
2025-01-09 15:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-09 16:16 ` patchwork-bot+bluetooth
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Fedor Pchelkin @ 2025-01-09 7:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz, Jakub Kicinski
Cc: Johan Hedberg, Marcel Holtmann, Ignat Korchagin,
Kuniyuki Iwashima, Eric Dumazet, linux-bluetooth, linux-kernel,
lvc-project, netdev, stable
On Wed, 18. Dec 00:19, Fedor Pchelkin wrote:
> A NULL sock pointer is passed into l2cap_sock_alloc() when it is called
> from l2cap_sock_new_connection_cb() and the error handling paths should
> also be aware of it.
>
> Seemingly a more elegant solution would be to swap bt_sock_alloc() and
> l2cap_chan_create() calls since they are not interdependent to that moment
> but then l2cap_chan_create() adds the soon to be deallocated and still
> dummy-initialized channel to the global list accessible by many L2CAP
> paths. The channel would be removed from the list in short period of time
> but be a bit more straight-forward here and just check for NULL instead of
> changing the order of function calls.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE static
> analysis tool.
>
> Fixes: 7c4f78cdb8e7 ("Bluetooth: L2CAP: do not leave dangling sk pointer on error in l2cap_sock_create()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru>
> ---
Urgh.. a bit confused about which tree the patch should go to - net or
bluetooth.
I've now noticed the Fixes commit went directly via net-next as part of a
series (despite "Bluetooth: L2CAP:" patches usually go through bluetooth
tree first). So what about this patch?
> net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
> index 3d2553dcdb1b..49f97d4138ea 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
> @@ -1888,7 +1888,8 @@ static struct sock *l2cap_sock_alloc(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
> chan = l2cap_chan_create();
> if (!chan) {
> sk_free(sk);
> - sock->sk = NULL;
> + if (sock)
> + sock->sk = NULL;
> return NULL;
> }
>
> --
> 2.39.5
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: L2CAP: handle NULL sock pointer in l2cap_sock_alloc
2025-01-09 7:47 ` Fedor Pchelkin
@ 2025-01-09 15:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-09 15:17 ` Fedor Pchelkin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2025-01-09 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fedor Pchelkin
Cc: Luiz Augusto von Dentz, Johan Hedberg, Marcel Holtmann,
Ignat Korchagin, Kuniyuki Iwashima, Eric Dumazet, linux-bluetooth,
linux-kernel, lvc-project, netdev, stable
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 10:47:12 +0300 Fedor Pchelkin wrote:
> On Wed, 18. Dec 00:19, Fedor Pchelkin wrote:
> > A NULL sock pointer is passed into l2cap_sock_alloc() when it is called
> > from l2cap_sock_new_connection_cb() and the error handling paths should
> > also be aware of it.
> >
> > Seemingly a more elegant solution would be to swap bt_sock_alloc() and
> > l2cap_chan_create() calls since they are not interdependent to that moment
> > but then l2cap_chan_create() adds the soon to be deallocated and still
> > dummy-initialized channel to the global list accessible by many L2CAP
> > paths. The channel would be removed from the list in short period of time
> > but be a bit more straight-forward here and just check for NULL instead of
> > changing the order of function calls.
> >
> > Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE static
> > analysis tool.
> >
> > Fixes: 7c4f78cdb8e7 ("Bluetooth: L2CAP: do not leave dangling sk pointer on error in l2cap_sock_create()")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru>
> > ---
>
> Urgh.. a bit confused about which tree the patch should go to - net or
> bluetooth.
>
> I've now noticed the Fixes commit went directly via net-next as part of a
> series (despite "Bluetooth: L2CAP:" patches usually go through bluetooth
> tree first). So what about this patch?
7c4f78cdb8e7 went directly to net-next because it was a larger series touching
multiple sub-subsystems:
$ git log -12 --graph --oneline 2d859aff775df54
* 2d859aff775d Merge branch 'do-not-leave-dangling-sk-pointers-in-pf-create-functions'
|\
| * 18429e6e0c2a Revert "net: do not leave a dangling sk pointer, when socket creation fails"
| * 48156296a08c net: warn, if pf->create does not clear sock->sk on error
| * 9df99c395d0f net: inet6: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in inet6_create()
| * 9365fa510c6f net: inet: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in inet_create()
| * b4fcd63f6ef7 net: ieee802154: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in ieee802154_create()
| * 811a7ca7320c net: af_can: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in can_create()
| * 3945c799f12b Bluetooth: RFCOMM: avoid leaving dangling sk pointer in rfcomm_sock_alloc()
| * 7c4f78cdb8e7 Bluetooth: L2CAP: do not leave dangling sk pointer on error in l2cap_sock_create()
| * 46f2a11cb82b af_packet: avoid erroring out after sock_init_data() in packet_create()
|/
* 397006ba5d91 net/sched: cbs: Fix integer overflow in cbs_set_port_rate()
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: L2CAP: handle NULL sock pointer in l2cap_sock_alloc
2025-01-09 15:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2025-01-09 15:17 ` Fedor Pchelkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Fedor Pchelkin @ 2025-01-09 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski, Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Cc: Johan Hedberg, Marcel Holtmann, Ignat Korchagin,
Kuniyuki Iwashima, Eric Dumazet, linux-bluetooth, linux-kernel,
lvc-project, netdev, stable
On Thu, 09. Jan 07:11, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 10:47:12 +0300 Fedor Pchelkin wrote:
> > Urgh.. a bit confused about which tree the patch should go to - net or
> > bluetooth.
> >
> > I've now noticed the Fixes commit went directly via net-next as part of a
> > series (despite "Bluetooth: L2CAP:" patches usually go through bluetooth
> > tree first). So what about this patch?
>
> 7c4f78cdb8e7 went directly to net-next because it was a larger series touching
> multiple sub-subsystems:
Okay. So I'd expect Luiz to pick up the current patch then, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: L2CAP: handle NULL sock pointer in l2cap_sock_alloc
2024-12-17 21:19 [PATCH] Bluetooth: L2CAP: handle NULL sock pointer in l2cap_sock_alloc Fedor Pchelkin
2024-12-21 8:17 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-09 7:47 ` Fedor Pchelkin
@ 2025-01-09 16:16 ` patchwork-bot+bluetooth
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+bluetooth @ 2025-01-09 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fedor Pchelkin
Cc: luiz.dentz, kuba, johan.hedberg, marcel, ignat, kuniyu, edumazet,
linux-bluetooth, linux-kernel, lvc-project, netdev, stable
Hello:
This patch was applied to bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git (master)
by Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:19:59 +0300 you wrote:
> A NULL sock pointer is passed into l2cap_sock_alloc() when it is called
> from l2cap_sock_new_connection_cb() and the error handling paths should
> also be aware of it.
>
> Seemingly a more elegant solution would be to swap bt_sock_alloc() and
> l2cap_chan_create() calls since they are not interdependent to that moment
> but then l2cap_chan_create() adds the soon to be deallocated and still
> dummy-initialized channel to the global list accessible by many L2CAP
> paths. The channel would be removed from the list in short period of time
> but be a bit more straight-forward here and just check for NULL instead of
> changing the order of function calls.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- Bluetooth: L2CAP: handle NULL sock pointer in l2cap_sock_alloc
https://git.kernel.org/bluetooth/bluetooth-next/c/a5d2ee08adc1
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-01-09 16:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-12-17 21:19 [PATCH] Bluetooth: L2CAP: handle NULL sock pointer in l2cap_sock_alloc Fedor Pchelkin
2024-12-21 8:17 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-09 7:47 ` Fedor Pchelkin
2025-01-09 15:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-09 15:17 ` Fedor Pchelkin
2025-01-09 16:16 ` patchwork-bot+bluetooth
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).