From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39D921C5496 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 18:33:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736793188; cv=none; b=SnzCQPIeD7sNi8yxaH4B5xcf8DetAlrZIfjd5+P23ptqb11pMcZtaA7WFceF6NrwPpidM78JSBHsuZvTemBpZBm44owHMRz7pqkDOePHNG6yL15IWwFBhmrUqLARp5MRm1wHn1LoYMltE7IzHaS7s1YTvyhBvj3Oyft6qmORDos= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736793188; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ftuGto6o0TyZO6bCqv7JLGst0izHcOC60PbCmGiNDYM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GaOq6sBM8kNllVFWPt8QrB89s+BSb8PWtHzFHezTBExFm3YEhPykgDEOsdSOb4p+X+YK08H3FtkVh0/NzulaEYrp/cGtaq6+JTglJIksjnR37AsscrpAj7RFoj5vKy6ycYYCjdVHGO5EY93rQ248q6wUIcFjmWHlkSpPlXX2pow= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=i62wOox8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="i62wOox8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 536F5C4CED6; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 18:33:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1736793187; bh=ftuGto6o0TyZO6bCqv7JLGst0izHcOC60PbCmGiNDYM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=i62wOox8MniqsjtQT9Hq6aGo5XuV8xP9s5ba2+LMgJHKnSvPA3hRONomqBADIKvIO ydYt8aMMyV9fIvD6W0lE53JFfltBL+RwyBfod5AKvWaWkjLJOJ40zyFuLLAh8eWanS 31u2dQ/OfOP8t5Ywb3Lfor8ip2k2xGUo5EeQcdeKcIPpggCUqBrrdN3Xn0iGTQTnIo HsPaX1f4KPZ3ZnO3C6rw0ovlrKtrOwqHhkXYE9SH+aOGGNI16g2xeM1f9wgrBplFzH 3Mzsahxc0NjTYpKsFk/ykn5JfwSYFwZPJsnqC1VBPk3bGS+bfXAs1y/dwYRFfp2zTq RoVV+qtMkmAMA== Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 10:33:06 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jacob Keller Cc: Tony Nguyen , , , , , , , , , , , "Karol Kolacinski" , Rinitha S Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/13] ice: use rd32_poll_timeout_atomic in ice_read_phy_tstamp_ll_e810 Message-ID: <20250113103306.5b4f8f86@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250108221753.2055987-1-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> <20250108221753.2055987-9-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> <20250109182148.398f1cf1@kernel.org> <55655440-71b4-49e0-9fc8-d8b1b4f77ab4@intel.com> <20250110172536.7165c528@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 10:18:05 -0800 Jacob Keller wrote: > > Ack, and short hands make sense. But both rd32_poll_timeout_atomic and > > the exiting rd32_poll_timeout have a single user. > > The intention with introducing these is to help make it easier for other > developers to use poll_timeout and friends throughout the driver. > There's only one user now, but my intention had been that we'd see more > as it becomes more known and is easier to use. IMHO the ease of use gain is equal to the loss of generality (driver local flavor of a common function will make contributing outside the driver harder). To be clear it's not a blocker, I'm only complaining because there was a bug in the other patch.