From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
Cc: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@engleder-embedded.com>,
magnus.karlsson@intel.com, andrew@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tsnep: Link queues to NAPIs
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:31:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250113143109.60afa59a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z4WRyI-_f9J4wPVL@LQ3V64L9R2>
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:20:56 -0800 Joe Damato wrote:
> > XDP and AF_XDP are different things. The XDP part of AF_XDP is to some
> > extent for advertising purposes :) If memory serves me well:
> >
> > XDP Tx -> these are additional queues automatically allocated for
> > in-kernel XDP, allocated when XDP is attached on Rx.
> > These should _not_ be listed in netlink queue, or NAPI;
> > IOW should not be linked to NAPI instances.
> > XDP Rx -> is not a thing, XDP attaches to stack queues, there are no
> > dedicated XDP Rx queues
> > AF_XDP -> AF_XDP "takes over" stack queues. It's a bit of a gray area.
> > I don't recall if we made a call on these being linked, but
> > they could probably be listed like devmem as a queue with
> > an extra attribute, not a completely separate queue type.
>
> Sorry to be an annoyance, but could this be added to docs somewhere?
>
> I think I did the AF_XDP case I did two different ways; exported for
> mlx5, but (iiuc) not exporter for igc.
Yes, I think netdev.yaml is the best place to document the meaning of
rx and tx queue type. Are you going to take a stab at it?
> I don't want to hijack Gerhard's thread; maybe I should start a new
> thread to double check that the drivers I modified are right?
Ideally we'd have a test for this. How is your Python?
tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/queues.py
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-13 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-10 22:39 [PATCH net-next] tsnep: Link queues to NAPIs Gerhard Engleder
2025-01-13 12:24 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-01-13 19:59 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-13 20:32 ` Gerhard Engleder
2025-01-13 21:48 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-13 21:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-13 22:20 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-13 22:31 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-01-13 22:36 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 20:58 ` Gerhard Engleder
2025-01-14 21:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 23:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2025-01-14 23:05 ` Joe Damato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250113143109.60afa59a@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gerhard@engleder-embedded.com \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).