netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
	pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com, andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com,
	somnath.kotur@broadcom.com,
	Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>,
	David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/10] bnxt_en: Extend queue stop/start for Tx rings
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 10:01:05 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250113160105.GA404075@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250113063927.4017173-10-michael.chan@broadcom.com>

On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 10:39:26PM -0800, Michael Chan wrote:
> From: Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@broadcom.com>
> 
> In order to use queue_stop/queue_start to support the new Steering
> Tags, we need to free the TX ring and TX completion ring if it is a
> combined channel with TX/RX sharing the same NAPI.  Otherwise
> TX completions will not have the updated Steering Tag.  With that
> we can now add napi_disable() and napi_enable() during queue_stop()/
> queue_start().  This will guarantee that NAPI will stop processing
> the completion entries in case there are additional pending entries
> in the completion rings after queue_stop().
> 
> There could be some NQEs sitting unprocessed while NAPI is disabled
> thereby leaving the NQ unarmed.  Explictily Re-arm the NQ after
> napi_enable() in queue start so that NAPI will resume properly.

s/Explictily Re-arm/Explicitly re-arm/ (typo + capitalization)

There's a mix of "TX/RX" vs "Tx/Rx" styles in the subjects and commit
logs of this series.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-13 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-13  6:39 [PATCH net-next 00/10] bnxt_en: Add NPAR 1.2 and TPH support Michael Chan
2025-01-13  6:39 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] bnxt_en: Set NAPR 1.2 support when registering with firmware Michael Chan
2025-01-13  7:56   ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-01-13  6:39 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] bnxt_en Refactor completion ring allocation logic for P5_PLUS chips Michael Chan
2025-01-13  7:59   ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-01-13  6:39 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] bnxt_en: Refactor TX ring allocation logic Michael Chan
2025-01-13  8:02   ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-01-13  6:39 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] bnxt_en: Refactor completion ring free routine Michael Chan
2025-01-13  8:06   ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-01-13  6:39 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] bnxt_en: Refactor bnxt_free_tx_rings() to free per Tx ring Michael Chan
2025-01-13  8:17   ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-01-13  6:39 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] bnxt_en: Refactor RX/RX AGG ring parameters setup for P5_PLUS Michael Chan
2025-01-13  8:27   ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-01-13  6:39 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] bnxt_en: Pass NQ ID to the FW when allocating RX/RX AGG rings Michael Chan
2025-01-13  8:29   ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-01-13  6:39 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] bnxt_en: Reallocate Rx completion ring for TPH support Michael Chan
2025-01-13  8:35   ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-01-14 21:42     ` Michael Chan
2025-01-15  5:58       ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-01-13  6:39 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] bnxt_en: Extend queue stop/start for Tx rings Michael Chan
2025-01-13  8:40   ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-01-14  2:05     ` Somnath Kotur
2025-01-15  1:29     ` Michael Chan
2025-01-13 16:01   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2025-01-14  4:57     ` Somnath Kotur
2025-01-14  8:48   ` kernel test robot
2025-01-14 11:23   ` kernel test robot
2025-01-13  6:39 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] bnxt_en: Add TPH support in BNXT driver Michael Chan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250113160105.GA404075@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com \
    --cc=somnath.kotur@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).