From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, jdamato@fastly.com,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 09/11] net: protect napi->irq with netdev_lock()
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 19:51:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250114035118.110297-10-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250114035118.110297-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Take netdev_lock() in netif_napi_set_irq(). All NAPI "control fields"
are now protected by that lock (most of the other ones are set during
napi add/del). The napi_hash_node is fully protected by the hash
spin lock, but close enough for the kdoc...
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 10 +++++++++-
net/core/dev.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 75c30404657b..03eeeac7dbdf 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ struct napi_struct {
unsigned long gro_flush_timeout;
unsigned long irq_suspend_timeout;
u32 defer_hard_irqs;
+ /* all fields past this point are write-protected by netdev_lock */
/* control-path-only fields follow */
struct list_head dev_list;
struct hlist_node napi_hash_node;
@@ -2705,11 +2706,18 @@ static inline void netdev_assert_locked_or_invisible(struct net_device *dev)
netdev_assert_locked(dev);
}
-static inline void netif_napi_set_irq(struct napi_struct *napi, int irq)
+static inline void netif_napi_set_irq_locked(struct napi_struct *napi, int irq)
{
napi->irq = irq;
}
+static inline void netif_napi_set_irq(struct napi_struct *napi, int irq)
+{
+ netdev_lock(napi->dev);
+ netif_napi_set_irq_locked(napi, irq);
+ netdev_unlock(napi->dev);
+}
+
/* Default NAPI poll() weight
* Device drivers are strongly advised to not use bigger value
*/
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 5872f0797cc3..df2a8b54a9f2 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6956,7 +6956,7 @@ void netif_napi_add_weight_locked(struct net_device *dev,
*/
if (dev->threaded && napi_kthread_create(napi))
dev->threaded = false;
- netif_napi_set_irq(napi, -1);
+ netif_napi_set_irq_locked(napi, -1);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_napi_add_weight_locked);
--
2.47.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-14 3:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-14 3:51 [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: use netdev->lock to protect NAPI Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 01/11] net: add netdev_lock() / netdev_unlock() helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 12:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 22:45 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: add helpers for lookup and walking netdevs under netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 14:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 22:53 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 23:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 03/11] net: make netdev_lock() protect netdev->reg_state Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 22:57 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 04/11] net: add netdev->up protected by netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:09 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 05/11] net: protect netdev->napi_list with netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:10 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 06/11] net: protect NAPI enablement " Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:00 ` Francois Romieu
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 07/11] net: make netdev netlink ops hold netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 08/11] net: protect threaded status of NAPI with netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 3:51 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-01-14 13:20 ` [PATCH net-next 09/11] net: protect napi->irq " Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:19 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 10/11] net: protect NAPI config fields " Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:20 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 11/11] netdev-genl: remove rtnl_lock protection from NAPI ops Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:21 ` Joe Damato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250114035118.110297-10-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).