netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, jdamato@fastly.com,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 03/11] net: make netdev_lock() protect netdev->reg_state
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 19:51:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250114035118.110297-4-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250114035118.110297-1-kuba@kernel.org>

Protect writes to netdev->reg_state with netdev_lock().
From now on holding netdev_lock() is sufficient to prevent
the net_device from getting unregistered, so code which
wants to hold just a single netdev around no longer needs
to hold rtnl_lock.

We do not protect the NETREG_UNREGISTERED -> NETREG_RELEASED
transition. We'd need to move mutex_destroy(netdev->lock)
to .release, but the real reason is that trying to stop
the unregistration process mid-way would be unsafe / crazy.
Taking references on such devices is not safe, either.
So the intended semantics are to lock REGISTERED devices.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/netdevice.h | 2 +-
 net/core/dev.c            | 6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 0e008ce9d5ee..bdbc5849469c 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -2448,7 +2448,7 @@ struct net_device {
 	 * Should always be taken using netdev_lock() / netdev_unlock() helpers.
 	 * Drivers are free to use it for other protection.
 	 *
-	 * Protects: @net_shaper_hierarchy.
+	 * Protects: @reg_state, @net_shaper_hierarchy.
 	 * Ordering: take after rtnl_lock.
 	 */
 	struct mutex		lock;
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 5c1e71afbe1c..2ded6eedb4cc 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -10778,7 +10778,9 @@ int register_netdevice(struct net_device *dev)
 
 	ret = netdev_register_kobject(dev);
 
+	netdev_lock(dev);
 	WRITE_ONCE(dev->reg_state, ret ? NETREG_UNREGISTERED : NETREG_REGISTERED);
+	netdev_unlock(dev);
 
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_uninit_notify;
@@ -11052,7 +11054,9 @@ void netdev_run_todo(void)
 			continue;
 		}
 
+		netdev_lock(dev);
 		WRITE_ONCE(dev->reg_state, NETREG_UNREGISTERED);
+		netdev_unlock(dev);
 		linkwatch_sync_dev(dev);
 	}
 
@@ -11658,7 +11662,9 @@ void unregister_netdevice_many_notify(struct list_head *head,
 	list_for_each_entry(dev, head, unreg_list) {
 		/* And unlink it from device chain. */
 		unlist_netdevice(dev);
+		netdev_lock(dev);
 		WRITE_ONCE(dev->reg_state, NETREG_UNREGISTERING);
+		netdev_unlock(dev);
 	}
 	flush_all_backlogs();
 
-- 
2.47.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-14  3:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-14  3:51 [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: use netdev->lock to protect NAPI Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14  3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 01/11] net: add netdev_lock() / netdev_unlock() helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 12:50   ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 22:45   ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14  3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: add helpers for lookup and walking netdevs under netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:03   ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 14:45     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 22:53   ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 23:51     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14  3:51 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-01-14 13:05   ` [PATCH net-next 03/11] net: make netdev_lock() protect netdev->reg_state Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 22:57   ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14  3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 04/11] net: add netdev->up protected by netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:08   ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:09   ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14  3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 05/11] net: protect netdev->napi_list with netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:09   ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:10   ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14  3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 06/11] net: protect NAPI enablement " Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:14   ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:00   ` Francois Romieu
2025-01-14  3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 07/11] net: make netdev netlink ops hold netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:16   ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14  3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 08/11] net: protect threaded status of NAPI with netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:19   ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14  3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 09/11] net: protect napi->irq " Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:20   ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:19   ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14  3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 10/11] net: protect NAPI config fields " Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:23   ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:20   ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14  3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 11/11] netdev-genl: remove rtnl_lock protection from NAPI ops Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:25   ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:21   ` Joe Damato

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250114035118.110297-4-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).