From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
wenjia@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com,
alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com,
guwen@linux.alibaba.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: use the correct ndev to find pnetid by pnetid table
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 13:07:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250114130747.77a56d9a.pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b1053a92-3a3f-4042-9be9-60b94b97747d@linux.alibaba.com>
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 13:43:44 +0800
Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> > I think I showed a valid and practical setup that would break with your
> > patch as is. Do you agree with that statement?
> Did you mean
> "
> Now for something like a bond of two OSA
> interfaces, I would expect the two legs of the bond to probably have a
> "HW PNETID", but the netdev representing the bond itself won't have one
> unless the Linux admin defines a software PNETID, which is work, and
> can't have a HW PNETID because it is a software construct within Linux.
> Breaking for example an active-backup bond setup where the legs have
> HW PNETIDs and the admin did not bother to specify a PNETID for the bond
> is not acceptable.
> " ?
> If the legs have HW pnetids, add pnetid to bond netdev will fail as
> smc_pnet_add_eth will check whether the base_ndev already have HW pnetid.
>
> If the legs without HW pnetids, and admin add pnetids to legs through smc_pnet.
> Yes, my patch will break the setup. What Paolo suggests(both checking ndev and
> base_ndev, and replace || by && )can help compatible with the setup.
I'm glad we agree on that part. Things are much more acceptable if we
are doing both base and ndev. Nevertheless I would like to understand
your problem better, and talk about it to my team. I will also ask some
questions in another email.
That said having things work differently if there is a HW PNETID on
the base, and different if there is none is IMHO wonky and again
asymmetric.
Imagine the following you have your nice little setup with a PNETID on
a non-leaf and a base_ndev that has no PNETID. Then your HW admin
configures a PNETID to your base_ndev, a different one. Suddenly
your ndev PNETID is ignored for reasons not obvious to you. Yes it is
similar to having a software PNETID on the base_ndev and getting it
overruled by a HW PNETID, but much less obvious IMHO. I also think
a software PNETID of the base should probably take precedence over over
the software pnetid of ndev.
Regards,
Halil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-14 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-27 4:04 [PATCH net] net/smc: use the correct ndev to find pnetid by pnetid table Guangguan Wang
2025-01-04 16:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-07 2:17 ` Wen Gu
2025-01-07 8:44 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-01-07 19:32 ` Halil Pasic
2025-01-08 4:57 ` Guangguan Wang
2025-01-09 3:04 ` Halil Pasic
2025-01-10 5:43 ` Guangguan Wang
2025-01-14 12:07 ` Halil Pasic [this message]
2025-01-15 11:53 ` Guangguan Wang
2025-02-10 11:16 ` Guangguan Wang
2025-02-10 13:13 ` Wenjia Zhang
2025-02-10 14:20 ` Halil Pasic
2025-02-10 14:19 ` Halil Pasic
2025-02-10 13:52 ` Halil Pasic
2025-02-11 3:44 ` Guangguan Wang
2025-03-03 14:24 ` Halil Pasic
2025-03-04 2:39 ` Guangguan Wang
2025-01-08 16:00 ` Alexandra Winter
2025-01-10 6:39 ` Guangguan Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250114130747.77a56d9a.pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).