netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	wenjia@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com,
	alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com,
	guwen@linux.alibaba.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: use the correct ndev to find pnetid by pnetid table
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 13:07:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250114130747.77a56d9a.pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b1053a92-3a3f-4042-9be9-60b94b97747d@linux.alibaba.com>

On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 13:43:44 +0800
Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:

> > I think I showed a valid and practical setup that would break with your
> > patch as is. Do you agree with that statement?  
> Did you mean
> "
> Now for something like a bond of two OSA
> interfaces, I would expect the two legs of the bond to probably have a
> "HW PNETID", but the netdev representing the bond itself won't have one
> unless the Linux admin defines a software PNETID, which is work, and
> can't have a HW PNETID because it is a software construct within Linux.
> Breaking for example an active-backup bond setup where the legs have
> HW PNETIDs and the admin did not bother to specify a PNETID for the bond
> is not acceptable.
> " ?
> If the legs have HW pnetids, add pnetid to bond netdev will fail as
> smc_pnet_add_eth will check whether the base_ndev already have HW pnetid.
> 
> If the legs without HW pnetids, and admin add pnetids to legs through smc_pnet.
> Yes, my patch will break the setup. What Paolo suggests(both checking ndev and
> base_ndev, and replace || by && )can help compatible with the setup.

I'm glad we agree on that part. Things are much more acceptable if we
are doing both base and ndev. Nevertheless I would like to understand
your problem better, and talk about it to my team. I will also ask some
questions in another email.

That said having things work differently if there is a HW PNETID on
the base, and different if there is none is IMHO wonky and again
asymmetric.

Imagine the following you have your nice little setup with a PNETID on
a non-leaf and a base_ndev that has no PNETID. Then your HW admin
configures a PNETID to your base_ndev, a different one. Suddenly
your ndev PNETID is ignored for reasons not obvious to you. Yes it is
similar to having a software PNETID on the base_ndev and getting it
overruled by a HW PNETID, but much less obvious IMHO. I also think
a software PNETID of the base should probably take precedence over over
the software pnetid of ndev.

Regards,
Halil

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-14 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-27  4:04 [PATCH net] net/smc: use the correct ndev to find pnetid by pnetid table Guangguan Wang
2025-01-04 16:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-07  2:17 ` Wen Gu
2025-01-07  8:44 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-01-07 19:32   ` Halil Pasic
2025-01-08  4:57     ` Guangguan Wang
2025-01-09  3:04       ` Halil Pasic
2025-01-10  5:43         ` Guangguan Wang
2025-01-14 12:07           ` Halil Pasic [this message]
2025-01-15 11:53             ` Guangguan Wang
2025-02-10 11:16               ` Guangguan Wang
2025-02-10 13:13                 ` Wenjia Zhang
2025-02-10 14:20                 ` Halil Pasic
2025-02-10 14:19               ` Halil Pasic
2025-02-10 13:52           ` Halil Pasic
2025-02-11  3:44             ` Guangguan Wang
2025-03-03 14:24               ` Halil Pasic
2025-03-04  2:39                 ` Guangguan Wang
2025-01-08 16:00     ` Alexandra Winter
2025-01-10  6:39       ` Guangguan Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250114130747.77a56d9a.pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).