From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4DAE3594F; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 02:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736907601; cv=none; b=bPG5YgiwyxKphEMpfOHabHjVpHowiShTfVU2El1qCTNmzcclVSAcGOwrt0AMpCySnBIsYGUkeQM28oGiyUs+fjX/md5aE6dNPUvWh5LndhnOXF1qPbQHRy19+WW/zbG95E9Ddg1dnj7VKkjXE+nREfpB+QbjuGh/aTc3+jjMlXU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736907601; c=relaxed/simple; bh=k5zcdfRd+dirvcL8WCDgycvlSRDQLgmbaRl4EKUNh8k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=avIR0ogshtQNIhFEc6vSVe+Ten3MCoGABpfiFAhWSsPN3M5sB60UZ0xb8SZ1d5HITPMFdC38x4iaMwwCSElyQiC3TwCpdwImDGE1zRP0a7BoXyrLPlmmLMJLcND3oTyEgsbnU/a+FQquAU6vR+B+9/ukTP5ivuFTXPaUDpaEmxM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=F18nyyAY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="F18nyyAY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 379E2C4CEDD; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 02:20:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1736907601; bh=k5zcdfRd+dirvcL8WCDgycvlSRDQLgmbaRl4EKUNh8k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=F18nyyAYLuvENyVSSD71xF45K2a6V9tKMNA9Jg5utrotWZdfHvUhkle8ERQPMAF/j 9X2YVem+hIZKDHX+CHUCaSP6kW3XEbjsX5mky8Vn6aLbtV64WIqrAGZrJjMtsjnGFV 5WbNyMLFhHYZBf5qz7P5JbXLAqZkSKdbBIb9aBJ5Sfv+VGkc/i5LchZZeCX0/w3uMn Kve9q964/87EekbJHWGGPpvg55HqskaqJHZHXsn9kEkCMjJ2u9A7+WVPXrWxqRZdER yloi7L0GfaMhe0P/MDptWxXLeLmsW2lHzpEUmYIOcKRo3nDtt+qF6jCBpotrYlorde FXY4LTwo5Yu9A== Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 18:20:00 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Joe Damato Cc: Furong Xu <0x1207@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Lobakin , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Maxime Coquelin , xfr@outlook.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: stmmac: Optimize cache prefetch in RX path Message-ID: <20250114182000.4ca2c433@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <668cfa117e41a0f1325593c94f6bb739c3bb38da.1736777576.git.0x1207@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 15:31:05 -0800 Joe Damato wrote: > > @@ -5525,6 +5521,7 @@ static int stmmac_rx(struct stmmac_priv *priv, int limit, u32 queue) > > > > dma_sync_single_for_cpu(priv->device, buf->addr, > > buf1_len, dma_dir); > > + prefetch(page_address(buf->page) + buf->page_offset); > > Minor nit: I've seen in other drivers authors using net_prefetch. > Probably not worth a re-roll just for something this minor. Let's respin. I don't know how likely stmmac is to be integrated into an SoC with 64B cachelines these days, but since you caught this - why not potentially save someone from investigating this later.. -- pw-bot: cr