netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, jdamato@fastly.com,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 07/11] net: make netdev netlink ops hold netdev_lock()
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:53:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250115035319.559603-8-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250115035319.559603-1-kuba@kernel.org>

In prep for dropping rtnl_lock, start locking netdev->lock in netlink
genl ops. We need to be using netdev->up instead of flags & IFF_UP.

We can remove the RCU lock protection for the NAPI since NAPI list
is protected by netdev->lock already.

Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
 net/core/dev.h         |  1 -
 net/core/dev.c         |  3 ++-
 net/core/netdev-genl.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.h b/net/core/dev.h
index ef37e2dd44f4..a5b166bbd169 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.h
+++ b/net/core/dev.h
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ struct sd_flow_limit {
 
 extern int netdev_flow_limit_table_len;
 
-struct napi_struct *netdev_napi_by_id(struct net *net, unsigned int napi_id);
 struct napi_struct *
 netdev_napi_by_id_lock(struct net *net, unsigned int napi_id);
 struct net_device *dev_get_by_napi_id(unsigned int napi_id);
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 9cf93868ac7e..9734c3f5b862 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -767,7 +767,8 @@ static struct napi_struct *napi_by_id(unsigned int napi_id)
 }
 
 /* must be called under rcu_read_lock(), as we dont take a reference */
-struct napi_struct *netdev_napi_by_id(struct net *net, unsigned int napi_id)
+static struct napi_struct *
+netdev_napi_by_id(struct net *net, unsigned int napi_id)
 {
 	struct napi_struct *napi;
 
diff --git a/net/core/netdev-genl.c b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
index c59619a2ec23..810a446ab62c 100644
--- a/net/core/netdev-genl.c
+++ b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ netdev_nl_napi_fill_one(struct sk_buff *rsp, struct napi_struct *napi,
 	void *hdr;
 	pid_t pid;
 
-	if (!(napi->dev->flags & IFF_UP))
+	if (!napi->dev->up)
 		return 0;
 
 	hdr = genlmsg_iput(rsp, info);
@@ -230,17 +230,16 @@ int netdev_nl_napi_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	rtnl_lock();
-	rcu_read_lock();
 
-	napi = netdev_napi_by_id(genl_info_net(info), napi_id);
+	napi = netdev_napi_by_id_lock(genl_info_net(info), napi_id);
 	if (napi) {
 		err = netdev_nl_napi_fill_one(rsp, napi, info);
+		netdev_unlock(napi->dev);
 	} else {
 		NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(info->extack, info->attrs[NETDEV_A_NAPI_ID]);
 		err = -ENOENT;
 	}
 
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	rtnl_unlock();
 
 	if (err) {
@@ -266,7 +265,7 @@ netdev_nl_napi_dump_one(struct net_device *netdev, struct sk_buff *rsp,
 	unsigned int prev_id;
 	int err = 0;
 
-	if (!(netdev->flags & IFF_UP))
+	if (!netdev->up)
 		return err;
 
 	prev_id = UINT_MAX;
@@ -303,13 +302,15 @@ int netdev_nl_napi_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 
 	rtnl_lock();
 	if (ifindex) {
-		netdev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ifindex);
-		if (netdev)
+		netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock(net, ifindex);
+		if (netdev) {
 			err = netdev_nl_napi_dump_one(netdev, skb, info, ctx);
-		else
+			netdev_unlock(netdev);
+		} else {
 			err = -ENODEV;
+		}
 	} else {
-		for_each_netdev_dump(net, netdev, ctx->ifindex) {
+		for_each_netdev_lock_scoped(net, netdev, ctx->ifindex) {
 			err = netdev_nl_napi_dump_one(netdev, skb, info, ctx);
 			if (err < 0)
 				break;
@@ -358,17 +359,16 @@ int netdev_nl_napi_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 	napi_id = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETDEV_A_NAPI_ID]);
 
 	rtnl_lock();
-	rcu_read_lock();
 
-	napi = netdev_napi_by_id(genl_info_net(info), napi_id);
+	napi = netdev_napi_by_id_lock(genl_info_net(info), napi_id);
 	if (napi) {
 		err = netdev_nl_napi_set_config(napi, info);
+		netdev_unlock(napi->dev);
 	} else {
 		NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(info->extack, info->attrs[NETDEV_A_NAPI_ID]);
 		err = -ENOENT;
 	}
 
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	rtnl_unlock();
 
 	return err;
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ netdev_nl_queue_fill(struct sk_buff *rsp, struct net_device *netdev, u32 q_idx,
 {
 	int err;
 
-	if (!(netdev->flags & IFF_UP))
+	if (!netdev->up)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	err = netdev_nl_queue_validate(netdev, q_idx, q_type);
@@ -474,11 +474,13 @@ int netdev_nl_queue_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 
 	rtnl_lock();
 
-	netdev = __dev_get_by_index(genl_info_net(info), ifindex);
-	if (netdev)
+	netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock(genl_info_net(info), ifindex);
+	if (netdev) {
 		err = netdev_nl_queue_fill(rsp, netdev, q_id, q_type, info);
-	else
+		netdev_unlock(netdev);
+	} else {
 		err = -ENODEV;
+	}
 
 	rtnl_unlock();
 
@@ -499,7 +501,7 @@ netdev_nl_queue_dump_one(struct net_device *netdev, struct sk_buff *rsp,
 {
 	int err = 0;
 
-	if (!(netdev->flags & IFF_UP))
+	if (!netdev->up)
 		return err;
 
 	for (; ctx->rxq_idx < netdev->real_num_rx_queues; ctx->rxq_idx++) {
@@ -532,13 +534,15 @@ int netdev_nl_queue_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 
 	rtnl_lock();
 	if (ifindex) {
-		netdev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ifindex);
-		if (netdev)
+		netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock(net, ifindex);
+		if (netdev) {
 			err = netdev_nl_queue_dump_one(netdev, skb, info, ctx);
-		else
+			netdev_unlock(netdev);
+		} else {
 			err = -ENODEV;
+		}
 	} else {
-		for_each_netdev_dump(net, netdev, ctx->ifindex) {
+		for_each_netdev_lock_scoped(net, netdev, ctx->ifindex) {
 			err = netdev_nl_queue_dump_one(netdev, skb, info, ctx);
 			if (err < 0)
 				break;
-- 
2.48.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-15  3:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-15  3:53 [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: use netdev->lock to protect NAPI Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/11] net: add netdev_lock() / netdev_unlock() helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  8:21   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15  8:36   ` Przemek Kitszel
2025-01-15  9:24     ` Ido Schimmel
2025-01-15 14:08     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15 14:24       ` Przemek Kitszel
2025-01-15  3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/11] net: make netdev_lock() protect netdev->reg_state Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  8:30   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15 14:18     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/11] net: add helpers for lookup and walking netdevs under netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  8:41   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15  3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/11] net: add netdev->up protected by netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  8:45   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15  3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/11] net: protect netdev->napi_list with netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  8:57   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-17 22:21     ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-17 22:52       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/11] net: protect NAPI enablement " Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  9:02   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-21  8:32   ` Dan Carpenter
2025-01-21  8:50     ` David Laight
2025-01-21 15:27     ` Dan Carpenter
2025-01-15  3:53 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-01-15  9:07   ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/11] net: make netdev netlink ops hold netdev_lock() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15  3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/11] net: protect threaded status of NAPI with netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  9:09   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15  3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/11] net: protect napi->irq " Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  9:12   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15  3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/11] net: protect NAPI config fields " Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  9:15   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15  3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/11] netdev-genl: remove rtnl_lock protection from NAPI ops Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  9:18   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-16  3:30 ` [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: use netdev->lock to protect NAPI patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250115035319.559603-8-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).