From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: <ychemla@nvidia.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <horms@kernel.org>,
<kuba@kernel.org>, <kuni1840@gmail.com>, <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 4/4] net: Hold rtnl_net_lock() in (un)?register_netdevice_notifier_dev_net().
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 11:54:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250116025435.85541-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <146eabfe-123c-4970-901e-e961b4c09bc3@nvidia.com>
Thanks for the report!
From: Yael Chemla <ychemla@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:16:27 +0200
> we observed in our regression tests the following issue:
>
> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in notifier_call_chain+0x22c/0x280
> kasan_report+0xbd/0xf0
> RIP: 0033:0x7f70839018b7
> kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
> kasan_save_track+0x10/0x30
> __kasan_kmalloc+0x83/0x90
> kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
> kasan_save_track+0x10/0x30
> kasan_save_free_info+0x37/0x50
> __kasan_slab_free+0x33/0x40
> page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in notifier_call_chain+0x222/0x280
> kasan_report+0xbd/0xf0
> RIP: 0033:0x7f70839018b7
> kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
> kasan_save_track+0x10/0x30
> __kasan_kmalloc+0x83/0x90
> kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
> kasan_save_track+0x10/0x30
> kasan_save_free_info+0x37/0x50
> __kasan_slab_free+0x33/0x40
> page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
>
> and there are many more of that kind.
Do you have any other stack traces with more callers info ?
Also can you decode the trace with ./scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh ?
>
> it happens after applying commit 7fb1073300a2 ("net: Hold
> rtnl_net_lock() in (un)?register_netdevice_notifier_dev_net()")
>
> test scenario includes configuration and traffic over two namespaces
> associated with two different VFs.
Could you elaborate more about the test scenario, especially
how each device/netns is dismantled after the test case ?
I guess the VF is moved to init_net ?
>
>
> On 04/01/2025 8:37, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > (un)?register_netdevice_notifier_dev_net() hold RTNL before triggering
> > the notifier for all netdev in the netns.
> >
> > Let's convert the RTNL to rtnl_net_lock().
> >
> > Note that move_netdevice_notifiers_dev_net() is assumed to be (but not
> > yet) protected by per-netns RTNL of both src and dst netns; we need to
> > convert wireless and hyperv drivers that call dev_change_net_namespace().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
> > ---
> > net/core/dev.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> > index f6c6559e2548..a0dd34463901 100644
> > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > @@ -1943,15 +1943,17 @@ int register_netdevice_notifier_dev_net(struct net_device *dev,
> > struct notifier_block *nb,
> > struct netdev_net_notifier *nn)
> > {
> > + struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
>
> it seems to happen since the net pointer is acquired here without a lock.
> Note that KASAN issue is not triggered when executing with rtnl_lock()
> taken before this line. and our kernel .config expands
> rtnl_net_lock(net) to rtnl_lock() (CONFIG_DEBUG_NET_SMALL_RTNL is not set).
It sounds like the device was being moved to another netns while
unregister_netdevice_notifier_dev_net() was called.
Could you check if dev_net() is changed before/after rtnl_lock() in
* register_netdevice_notifier_dev_net()
* unregister_netdevice_notifier_dev_net()
?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-16 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-04 6:37 [PATCH v1 net-next 0/4] net: Hold per-netns RTNL during netdev notifier registration Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-04 6:37 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 1/4] net: Convert netdev_chain to blocking_notifier Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-08 2:28 ` kernel test robot
2025-01-04 6:37 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 2/4] net: Hold __rtnl_net_lock() in (un)?register_netdevice_notifier() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-04 6:37 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 3/4] net: Hold rtnl_net_lock() in (un)?register_netdevice_notifier_net() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-04 6:37 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 4/4] net: Hold rtnl_net_lock() in (un)?register_netdevice_notifier_dev_net() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15 22:16 ` Yael Chemla
2025-01-16 2:54 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2025-01-20 18:55 ` Yael Chemla
2025-01-27 17:26 ` Yael Chemla
2025-01-27 17:54 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-27 23:26 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-29 16:21 ` Yael Chemla
2025-01-30 0:32 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-04 15:37 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 0/4] net: Hold per-netns RTNL during netdev notifier registration Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-05 7:59 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250116025435.85541-1-kuniyu@amazon.com \
--to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=ychemla@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).