From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E5C71A83F1 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 21:22:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737148930; cv=none; b=C4RRSblwi76hVAHoiOKkC49isnzIkgljgkUk+XUTz4YOMyARQZotMCoA9D4fbgMytNdujrhjqFFhcWx8lUYGpvl7Sg+ZhFUb9kQ/UZfFVj4Nns09w7I2X8JDanJRHrwy5RciFvmrsWjUr9GnDmLTLvxGD6SkAG3ysEsOuoX4uZ0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737148930; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/2ljQ+ToC/Mrn+hGDWBUtW5XHRW1AEb66dvHNcMn+xM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JRBszVnzlncT+D1tL+443HWOTBv6SaeW2zFVSUt5hEIvz/XSpC61Kcf/IQqDFyTHXGZwCnDFiIfrXoDaoYW7s0822oKwPB0YVEzi/TRC2YfR2Kc+kvCNCpPwJE6wrAbQ02LRHQLb6TNHAhDJv+rk2vYoh083240+FkkFD1XsA9w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=tr3l9tOS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="tr3l9tOS" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7E5DC4CEDD; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 21:22:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1737148929; bh=/2ljQ+ToC/Mrn+hGDWBUtW5XHRW1AEb66dvHNcMn+xM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tr3l9tOS3s2mvzS//wIP0Ls4aiih6Av+C7PouZnPdEcqVTmg2raxbf2c0e6EfH5QE dOJFORRk4FCt/U8apwR4lbhwc/VFBi8RFqgCvbu7ZlUPlFITLEV9kzyxWtw2TjQBsu 4kzzhBwlkyiqjbD3GB9gTqGp0mDbKWmlwQ/hOrlEHspXwsKHxvFKDReG02rhZjPvlV k1t2qwX6Y+vrY1PJlVoTsh3Rg/Z+GIRO6V/r32WV1XSepMVZ/BfdGfQBWLHlp23Tx1 i89RWI/DdpFVT+XaFMGhB5belCXfx45zn64M08Fws+WGR9zCVIWtav15hhMBbaEtaU gtstHBxA/VtcA== Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 13:22:08 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Maciej Fijalkowski Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, magnus.karlsson@intel.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com, xudu@redhat.com, mschmidt@redhat.com, jmaxwell@redhat.com, poros@redhat.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 intel-net 0/3] ice: fix Rx data path for heavy 9k MTU traffic Message-ID: <20250117132208.1f87a2dc@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20250117151900.525509-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> References: <20250117151900.525509-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 16:18:57 +0100 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > Subject: [PATCH v2 intel-net 0/3] ice: fix Rx data path for heavy 9k MTU traffic nit: could you use iwl-net and iwl-next as the tree names? That's what we match on in NIPA to categorize Intel patches.