* [PATCH] crypto: chtls: Add check alloc_skb() returned value
@ 2025-01-17 3:13 Charles Han
2025-01-17 13:29 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Charles Han @ 2025-01-17 3:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ayush.sawal, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni,
atul.gupta, werner
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, Charles Han
alloc_skb() can return a NULL pointer on failure.But these returned
value in send_defer_abort_rpl() and chtls_close_conn() not checked.
Fixes: cc35c88ae4db ("crypto : chtls - CPL handler definition")
Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@inspur.com>
---
.../net/ethernet/chelsio/inline_crypto/chtls/chtls_cm.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/inline_crypto/chtls/chtls_cm.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/inline_crypto/chtls/chtls_cm.c
index 6f6525983130..725cce34f25a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/inline_crypto/chtls/chtls_cm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/inline_crypto/chtls/chtls_cm.c
@@ -306,6 +306,10 @@ static void chtls_close_conn(struct sock *sk)
tid = csk->tid;
skb = alloc_skb(len, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
+ if (!skb) {
+ pr_warn("%s: cannot allocate skb!\n", __func__);
+ return;
+ }
req = (struct cpl_close_con_req *)__skb_put(skb, len);
memset(req, 0, len);
req->wr.wr_hi = htonl(FW_WR_OP_V(FW_TP_WR) |
@@ -1991,6 +1995,11 @@ static void send_defer_abort_rpl(struct chtls_dev *cdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
reply_skb = alloc_skb(sizeof(struct cpl_abort_rpl),
GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
+ if (!reply_skb) {
+ pr_warn("%s: cannot allocate skb!\n", __func__);
+ return;
+ }
+
__skb_put(reply_skb, sizeof(struct cpl_abort_rpl));
set_abort_rpl_wr(reply_skb, GET_TID(req),
(req->status & CPL_ABORT_NO_RST));
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] crypto: chtls: Add check alloc_skb() returned value
2025-01-17 3:13 [PATCH] crypto: chtls: Add check alloc_skb() returned value Charles Han
@ 2025-01-17 13:29 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2025-01-17 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Charles Han
Cc: ayush.sawal, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni,
atul.gupta, werner, netdev, linux-kernel
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 11:13:28AM +0800, Charles Han wrote:
> alloc_skb() can return a NULL pointer on failure.But these returned
> value in send_defer_abort_rpl() and chtls_close_conn() not checked.
>
> Fixes: cc35c88ae4db ("crypto : chtls - CPL handler definition")
> Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@inspur.com>
> ---
> .../net/ethernet/chelsio/inline_crypto/chtls/chtls_cm.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/inline_crypto/chtls/chtls_cm.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/inline_crypto/chtls/chtls_cm.c
> index 6f6525983130..725cce34f25a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/inline_crypto/chtls/chtls_cm.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/inline_crypto/chtls/chtls_cm.c
> @@ -306,6 +306,10 @@ static void chtls_close_conn(struct sock *sk)
> tid = csk->tid;
>
> skb = alloc_skb(len, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
> + if (!skb) {
> + pr_warn("%s: cannot allocate skb!\n", __func__);
> + return;
> + }
> req = (struct cpl_close_con_req *)__skb_put(skb, len);
> memset(req, 0, len);
> req->wr.wr_hi = htonl(FW_WR_OP_V(FW_TP_WR) |
> @@ -1991,6 +1995,11 @@ static void send_defer_abort_rpl(struct chtls_dev *cdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>
> reply_skb = alloc_skb(sizeof(struct cpl_abort_rpl),
> GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
> + if (!reply_skb) {
> + pr_warn("%s: cannot allocate skb!\n", __func__);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> __skb_put(reply_skb, sizeof(struct cpl_abort_rpl));
> set_abort_rpl_wr(reply_skb, GET_TID(req),
> (req->status & CPL_ABORT_NO_RST));
Hi Charles,
I agree that not checking for NULL skbs will very soon lead
to a NULL pointer dereference. But I wonder if this patch leads
us to a better place. Because by returning on skb allocation
failure in each of the above cases, don't we end up with
an inconsistent state?
Also, the above notwithstanding, I do wonder if:
a) the warnings should be errors
b) they should be rate limited
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-01-17 13:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-01-17 3:13 [PATCH] crypto: chtls: Add check alloc_skb() returned value Charles Han
2025-01-17 13:29 ` Simon Horman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).