From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60D1C8479; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 19:12:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737400373; cv=none; b=THRp4TMOZJ2Xi7WaWvA2Y3b9ojFT+Oh/g7WAk8Cjbe6MiS1jEAtZGPb7v3nDHcQMLjrBJAH4x7/ogmxdWQHvbUnLwcrGWSSP40pTXLPn/5TWAtUQRmFuIvwCZ+pmwZjGxx06tMipWuh7OTOtstpAzogmREdRST1t+5a1emOysDU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737400373; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Kh+DQwLKyClDbQ2S17AysOYPnYbZz9VzwkaJnYw2NEw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=H2Ay+GiLfcfSP/lvktwp8jLdey1tmJEChlx5IDxVTZFn/o9ahdESK3T4yJz1rGyyfLfIhUikIZXm658WHS5B13sp9NKj+eLL9Fo1bVKCClX6u/9AjZXqKOhMNMU+AYikXij9GDZrb9n3994Mruc8gWE5aqUfoOjOFrCy1515ffA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=QDPEHSdu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QDPEHSdu" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CA7EC4CEDD; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 19:12:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1737400372; bh=Kh+DQwLKyClDbQ2S17AysOYPnYbZz9VzwkaJnYw2NEw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=QDPEHSdu3KTXUtaudpyWdDO47omeskF37v7TUI3r61654dgTZREwK5kkE3QiQ1wtv Xv++u0RBs1QM7StarZtKfbgVEdi+HGtTzjOs3B86lUv81kgICkMryEZ7bW4oeiLz3R TJexhwlQegF74MwXknPzfnlq10JGTVm6bNkL2yeoKju4cNE/RGTn2nGoli2m5DoLK0 Kv9CTAkFhJWwp7vAiqtyujSwZx/D3CmbSRI+Ux0MDJ+tOMalmKThSa7LK/TSHkIN91 yvwRoSL8HYMQRSwHvT3yQ2++GMkRBFF+uVpLikXETdCSVr8GRfrsXzcVTp1QcTHZFg gWKPADSacovBw== Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 11:12:50 -0800 From: Eric Biggers To: David Howells Cc: Simon Horman , Herbert Xu , Chuck Lever , Trond Myklebust , "David S. Miller" , Marc Dionne , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Ard Biesheuvel , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/24] crypto: Add 'krb5enc' hash and cipher AEAD algorithm Message-ID: <20250120191250.GA39025@sol.localdomain> References: <20250120173937.GA2268@sol.localdomain> <20250120135754.GX6206@kernel.org> <20250117183538.881618-1-dhowells@redhat.com> <20250117183538.881618-4-dhowells@redhat.com> <1201143.1737383111@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <1212970.1737399580@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1212970.1737399580@warthog.procyon.org.uk> On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 06:59:40PM +0000, David Howells wrote: > Eric Biggers wrote: > > > Multiple requests in parallel, I think you mean? No, it doesn't, but it > > should. > > Not so much. This bug is on the asynchronous path and not tested by my > rxrpc/rxgk code which only exercises the synchronous path. I haven't tried to > make that asynchronous yet. I presume testmgr also only tests the sync path. > > David > I'm not sure I understand your question. Users of the crypto API can exclude asynchronous algorithms when selecting one, but the self-tests do not do that. In any case, why would you need anything to do asynchronous at all here? - Eric