From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-fw-52002.amazon.com (smtp-fw-52002.amazon.com [52.119.213.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41A6B188A0E for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 21:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=52.119.213.150 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737407651; cv=none; b=NRDXRfSp/WzvqY8OefGZ74mqXkJZQp1hNHRLvfjrBvtHbSaeAD1DwlYX2L8Q4HR4M1t4jlwdGs2fMehZkW6K7oL+Lx3NxMY1InXXjgELnO40kNOzZj5lcsYNn8ujkkBZ0ixdm1Zbn1RX6pU1fst4r+FdAscsxgL5pPECbJaj34A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737407651; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dDaiObEUCJuXNkdiPXiiZviq1Fhr5P1tDBSwVyZkTYw=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OXyxR91OcFDFq1G9xWyWccgFsDiqS22yps4WBGiSmLHAbaEBljZb16zFQeXi0gcMbw0YuhvPT67OvweQ+z3gBMgqwovEKjI/haWHhhMvlkzmWkkJGpBMzSxSSLJKfYROCnYMpD0iqZtXZWycy7zfvMjPz4N0Jd7pnwXNJDBKl0M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amazon.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=amazon.co.jp; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazon.com header.i=@amazon.com header.b=jrJ9ATjS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=52.119.213.150 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amazon.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=amazon.co.jp Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazon.com header.i=@amazon.com header.b="jrJ9ATjS" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amazon.com; i=@amazon.com; q=dns/txt; s=amazon201209; t=1737407647; x=1768943647; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=j1LG0FMxSKGfvKenkdWNkoLg97yHDtjYNKMnKBt2Lz4=; b=jrJ9ATjSMZDJhDub+6qF4GOpvOP2ai+4RVTl3GydnJy3aNo8sxz25v1m 7C6xrbntC3mCQAPR57DQbtMWw6QrgAdye9WsRwf9ZJhCI+Q9fXp0ZbFlI wIKQ5i6a9ybYFV9rB70VPxBX02T6weTdRbSl+Jjhdt+uTmrbBlRYb2eL4 w=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,220,1732579200"; d="scan'208";a="690559381" Received: from iad12-co-svc-p1-lb1-vlan3.amazon.com (HELO smtpout.prod.us-west-2.prod.farcaster.email.amazon.dev) ([10.43.8.6]) by smtp-border-fw-52002.iad7.amazon.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Jan 2025 21:14:03 +0000 Received: from EX19MTAUWC001.ant.amazon.com [10.0.38.20:50779] by smtpin.naws.us-west-2.prod.farcaster.email.amazon.dev [10.0.25.114:2525] with esmtp (Farcaster) id 853bbeb8-e78d-4df5-a9d2-8565152b5e07; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 21:14:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Farcaster-Flow-ID: 853bbeb8-e78d-4df5-a9d2-8565152b5e07 Received: from EX19D004ANA001.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.138) by EX19MTAUWC001.ant.amazon.com (10.250.64.174) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.2.1258.39; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 21:13:58 +0000 Received: from 6c7e67c6786f.amazon.com (10.187.170.57) by EX19D004ANA001.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.138) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.2.1258.39; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 21:13:56 +0000 From: Kuniyuki Iwashima To: CC: , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 09/11] ipv6: Move lifetime validation to inet6_rtm_newaddr(). Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 13:13:48 -0800 Message-ID: <20250120211348.88128-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 (Apple Git-154) In-Reply-To: <20250120122945.1bfd7435@kernel.org> References: <20250120122945.1bfd7435@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-ClientProxiedBy: EX19D040UWA004.ant.amazon.com (10.13.139.93) To EX19D004ANA001.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.138) From: Jakub Kicinski Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 12:29:45 -0800 > On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 17:06:06 +0900 Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > > + expires = 0; > > + flags = 0; > > Any reason not to add these to the cfg struct? > Because these are not strictly attributes for the address? Yes, I thought it's for fib6_config, but I have no strong preference. I can post a follow-up or v3.