netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org,
	willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, willemb@google.com,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 12/13] net-timestamp: introduce cgroup lock to avoid affecting non-bpf cases
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:29:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250121012901.87763-13-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250121012901.87763-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>

Introducing the lock to avoid affecting the applications which
are not using timestamping bpf feature.

Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
---
 net/core/skbuff.c     | 6 ++++--
 net/ipv4/tcp.c        | 3 ++-
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c  | 3 ++-
 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 3 ++-
 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 33340e0b094f..db5b4b653351 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -5605,11 +5605,13 @@ void __skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
 		return;
 
 	/* bpf extension feature entry */
-	if (skb_shinfo(orig_skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_BPF)
+	if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_SOCK_OPS) &&
+	    skb_shinfo(orig_skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_BPF)
 		skb_tstamp_tx_bpf(orig_skb, sk, tstype, sw, hwtstamps);
 
 	/* application feature entry */
-	if (!skb_enable_app_tstamp(orig_skb, tstype, sw))
+	if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_SOCK_OPS) &&
+	    !skb_enable_app_tstamp(orig_skb, tstype, sw))
 		return;
 
 	tsflags = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 49e489c346ea..d88160af00c4 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -493,7 +493,8 @@ static void tcp_tx_timestamp(struct sock *sk, struct sockcm_cookie *sockc)
 			shinfo->tskey = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq + skb->len - 1;
 	}
 
-	if (SK_BPF_CB_FLAG_TEST(sk, SK_BPF_CB_TX_TIMESTAMPING) && skb) {
+	if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_SOCK_OPS) &&
+	    SK_BPF_CB_FLAG_TEST(sk, SK_BPF_CB_TX_TIMESTAMPING) && skb) {
 		struct skb_shared_info *shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
 		struct tcp_skb_cb *tcb = TCP_SKB_CB(skb);
 
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index c8945f5be31b..e30607ba41e5 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -3324,7 +3324,8 @@ static void tcp_ack_tstamp(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 
 	/* Avoid cache line misses to get skb_shinfo() and shinfo->tx_flags */
 	if (likely(!TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->txstamp_ack &&
-		   !TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->txstamp_ack_bpf))
+		   !(cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_SOCK_OPS) &&
+		     TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->txstamp_ack_bpf)))
 		return;
 
 	shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index fc84ca669b76..483f19c2083e 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -1556,7 +1556,8 @@ static void tcp_adjust_pcount(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int de
 static bool tcp_has_tx_tstamp(const struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	return TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->txstamp_ack ||
-	       TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->txstamp_ack_bpf ||
+	       (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_SOCK_OPS) &&
+		TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->txstamp_ack_bpf) ||
 		(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_ANY_TSTAMP);
 }
 
-- 
2.43.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-21  1:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-21  1:28 [RFC PATCH net-next v6 00/13] net-timestamp: bpf extension to equip applications transparently Jason Xing
2025-01-21  1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 01/13] net-timestamp: add support for bpf_setsockopt() Jason Xing
2025-01-21  1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 02/13] net-timestamp: prepare for timestamping callbacks use Jason Xing
2025-01-21  5:08   ` Jason Xing
2025-01-21  1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 03/13] bpf: stop UDP sock accessing TCP fields in bpf callbacks Jason Xing
2025-01-24 23:40   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25  0:28     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-28  1:34       ` Jason Xing
2025-01-21  1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 04/13] bpf: stop UDP sock accessing TCP fields in sock_op BPF CALLs Jason Xing
2025-01-25  0:28   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25  1:15     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-25  1:32       ` Jason Xing
2025-01-25  2:25       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25  2:58         ` Jason Xing
2025-01-25  3:12         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25  3:43           ` Jason Xing
2025-01-21  1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 05/13] net-timestamp: prepare for isolating two modes of SO_TIMESTAMPING Jason Xing
2025-01-21  1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 06/13] net-timestamp: support SCM_TSTAMP_SCHED for bpf extension Jason Xing
2025-01-25  0:38   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25  1:16     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-21  1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 07/13] net-timestamp: support sw SCM_TSTAMP_SND " Jason Xing
2025-01-25  0:40   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25  1:17     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-21  1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 08/13] net-timestamp: support hw " Jason Xing
2025-01-25  0:46   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25  1:18     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-25  1:29       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25  1:35         ` Jason Xing
2025-01-25  2:36           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25  2:59             ` Jason Xing
2025-01-21  1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 09/13] net-timestamp: support SCM_TSTAMP_ACK " Jason Xing
2025-01-21  1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 10/13] net-timestamp: make TCP tx timestamp bpf extension work Jason Xing
2025-01-21  1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 11/13] net-timestamp: add a new callback in tcp_tx_timestamp() Jason Xing
2025-01-25  0:50   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25  1:21     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-21  1:29 ` Jason Xing [this message]
2025-01-25  1:09   ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 12/13] net-timestamp: introduce cgroup lock to avoid affecting non-bpf cases Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25  1:25     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-21  1:29 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v6 13/13] bpf: add simple bpf tests in the tx path for so_timestamping feature Jason Xing
2025-01-25  3:07   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-25  3:42     ` Jason Xing
2025-01-27 23:49       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-01-28  0:19         ` Jason Xing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250121012901.87763-13-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --to=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).