From: Sebastian Sewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net] xfrm: Don't disable preemption while looking up cache state.
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 17:20:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250123162045.INxxt33y@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z4oOldW33zFbYQ6/@gauss3.secunet.de>
For the state cache lookup xfrm_input_state_lookup() first disables
preemption, to remain on the CPU and then retrieves a per-CPU pointer.
Within the preempt-disable section it also acquires
netns_xfrm::xfrm_state_lock, a spinlock_t. This lock must not be
acquired with explicit disabled preemption (such as by get_cpu())
because this lock becomes a sleeping lock on PREEMPT_RT.
To remain on the same CPU is just an optimisation for the CPU local
lookup. The actual modification of the per-CPU variable happens with
netns_xfrm::xfrm_state_lock acquired.
Remove get_cpu() and use the state_cache_input on the current CPU.
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAADnVQKkCLaj=roayH=Mjiiqz_svdf1tsC3OE4EC0E=mAD+L1A@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 81a331a0e72dd ("xfrm: Add an inbound percpu state cache.")
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index 67ca7ac955a37..66b108a5b87d4 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -1116,9 +1116,8 @@ struct xfrm_state *xfrm_input_state_lookup(struct net *net, u32 mark,
{
struct hlist_head *state_cache_input;
struct xfrm_state *x = NULL;
- int cpu = get_cpu();
- state_cache_input = per_cpu_ptr(net->xfrm.state_cache_input, cpu);
+ state_cache_input = raw_cpu_ptr(net->xfrm.state_cache_input);
rcu_read_lock();
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(x, state_cache_input, state_cache_input) {
@@ -1150,7 +1149,6 @@ struct xfrm_state *xfrm_input_state_lookup(struct net *net, u32 mark,
out:
rcu_read_unlock();
- put_cpu();
return x;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_input_state_lookup);
--
2.47.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-23 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-18 0:07 xfrm in RT Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-18 8:32 ` Steffen Klassert
2024-12-18 15:44 ` Sebastian Sewior
2024-12-18 16:07 ` Sebastian Sewior
2025-01-17 8:17 ` Steffen Klassert
2025-01-17 8:02 ` Steffen Klassert
2025-01-23 16:20 ` Sebastian Sewior [this message]
2025-01-27 5:33 ` [PATCH net] xfrm: Don't disable preemption while looking up cache state Steffen Klassert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250123162045.INxxt33y@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).