From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
rdunlap@infradead.org, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC net-next v3 1/8] netconsole: consolidate send buffers into netconsole_target struct
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 07:16:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250124-netcon_cpu-v3-1-12a0d286ba1d@debian.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250124-netcon_cpu-v3-0-12a0d286ba1d@debian.org>
Move the static buffers from send_msg_no_fragmentation() and
send_msg_fragmented() into the netconsole_target structure. This
simplifies the code by:
- Eliminating redundant static buffers
- Centralizing buffer management in the target structure
- Reducing memory usage by 1KB (one buffer instead of two)
The buffer in netconsole_target is protected by target_list_lock,
maintaining the same synchronization semantics as the original code.
Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
---
drivers/net/netconsole.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/netconsole.c b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
index 86ab4a42769a49eebe5dd6f01dafafc6c86ec54f..1a78704681184673f5c1ba8ae665e46751384293 100644
--- a/drivers/net/netconsole.c
+++ b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
@@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ struct netconsole_target {
bool extended;
bool release;
struct netpoll np;
+ /* protected by target_list_lock */
+ char buf[MAX_PRINT_CHUNK];
};
#ifdef CONFIG_NETCONSOLE_DYNAMIC
@@ -1117,7 +1119,6 @@ static void send_msg_no_fragmentation(struct netconsole_target *nt,
int msg_len,
int release_len)
{
- static char buf[MAX_PRINT_CHUNK]; /* protected by target_list_lock */
const char *userdata = NULL;
const char *release;
@@ -1128,18 +1129,18 @@ static void send_msg_no_fragmentation(struct netconsole_target *nt,
if (release_len) {
release = init_utsname()->release;
- scnprintf(buf, MAX_PRINT_CHUNK, "%s,%s", release, msg);
+ scnprintf(nt->buf, MAX_PRINT_CHUNK, "%s,%s", release, msg);
msg_len += release_len;
} else {
- memcpy(buf, msg, msg_len);
+ memcpy(nt->buf, msg, msg_len);
}
if (userdata)
- msg_len += scnprintf(&buf[msg_len],
+ msg_len += scnprintf(&nt->buf[msg_len],
MAX_PRINT_CHUNK - msg_len,
"%s", userdata);
- send_udp(nt, buf, msg_len);
+ send_udp(nt, nt->buf, msg_len);
}
static void append_release(char *buf)
@@ -1150,7 +1151,7 @@ static void append_release(char *buf)
scnprintf(buf, MAX_PRINT_CHUNK, "%s,", release);
}
-static void send_fragmented_body(struct netconsole_target *nt, char *buf,
+static void send_fragmented_body(struct netconsole_target *nt,
const char *msgbody, int header_len,
int msgbody_len)
{
@@ -1181,7 +1182,7 @@ static void send_fragmented_body(struct netconsole_target *nt, char *buf,
int this_offset = 0;
int this_chunk = 0;
- this_header += scnprintf(buf + this_header,
+ this_header += scnprintf(nt->buf + this_header,
MAX_PRINT_CHUNK - this_header,
",ncfrag=%d/%d;", offset,
body_len);
@@ -1192,7 +1193,8 @@ static void send_fragmented_body(struct netconsole_target *nt, char *buf,
MAX_PRINT_CHUNK - this_header);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(this_chunk <= 0))
return;
- memcpy(buf + this_header, msgbody + offset, this_chunk);
+ memcpy(nt->buf + this_header, msgbody + offset,
+ this_chunk);
this_offset += this_chunk;
}
@@ -1226,13 +1228,13 @@ static void send_fragmented_body(struct netconsole_target *nt, char *buf,
*/
return;
- memcpy(buf + this_header + this_offset,
+ memcpy(nt->buf + this_header + this_offset,
userdata + sent_userdata,
this_chunk);
this_offset += this_chunk;
}
- send_udp(nt, buf, this_header + this_offset);
+ send_udp(nt, nt->buf, this_header + this_offset);
offset += this_offset;
}
}
@@ -1242,7 +1244,6 @@ static void send_msg_fragmented(struct netconsole_target *nt,
int msg_len,
int release_len)
{
- static char buf[MAX_PRINT_CHUNK]; /* protected by target_list_lock */
int header_len, msgbody_len;
const char *msgbody;
@@ -1260,16 +1261,16 @@ static void send_msg_fragmented(struct netconsole_target *nt,
* "ncfrag=<byte-offset>/<total-bytes>"
*/
if (release_len)
- append_release(buf);
+ append_release(nt->buf);
/* Copy the header into the buffer */
- memcpy(buf + release_len, msg, header_len);
+ memcpy(nt->buf + release_len, msg, header_len);
header_len += release_len;
/* for now on, the header will be persisted, and the msgbody
* will be replaced
*/
- send_fragmented_body(nt, buf, msgbody, header_len, msgbody_len);
+ send_fragmented_body(nt, msgbody, header_len, msgbody_len);
}
/**
--
2.43.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-24 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-24 15:16 [PATCH RFC net-next v3 0/8] netconsole: Add support for CPU population Breno Leitao
2025-01-24 15:16 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2025-01-28 16:11 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 1/8] netconsole: consolidate send buffers into netconsole_target struct Simon Horman
2025-01-30 10:35 ` Simon Horman
2025-01-31 13:11 ` Breno Leitao
2025-01-24 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 2/8] netconsole: Rename userdata to extradata Breno Leitao
2025-01-30 10:36 ` Simon Horman
2025-01-24 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 3/8] netconsole: Helper to count number of used entries Breno Leitao
2025-01-30 10:37 ` Simon Horman
2025-01-24 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 4/8] netconsole: Introduce configfs helpers for sysdata features Breno Leitao
2025-01-28 16:12 ` Simon Horman
2025-01-30 10:37 ` Simon Horman
2025-01-24 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 5/8] netconsole: Include sysdata in extradata entry count Breno Leitao
2025-01-30 10:38 ` Simon Horman
2025-01-24 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 6/8] netconsole: add support for sysdata and CPU population Breno Leitao
2025-01-30 10:38 ` Simon Horman
2025-01-24 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 7/8] netconsole: selftest: test for sysdata CPU Breno Leitao
2025-01-30 10:38 ` Simon Horman
2025-01-24 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 8/8] netconsole: docs: Add documentation for CPU number auto-population Breno Leitao
2025-01-24 16:15 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-01-27 17:10 ` Breno Leitao
2025-01-24 16:02 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 0/8] netconsole: Add support for CPU population Andrew Lunn
2025-01-27 9:52 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250124-netcon_cpu-v3-1-12a0d286ba1d@debian.org \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).