From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DB3A207A03 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 11:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737718667; cv=none; b=Ca/fcy5G1ulH6f6sRDYwer5kAaNeR2boEFqb67zHBDUbYMfeM2CxUkg4sHCC4nKdHXETBWk0sjej7sCmIo/jFDN3qpQu1C10DaccO8I1vlRebOXUOprelAaIf0G/n8cmFaniXPk8A4x1zbAMqLBYoso33Bd50wD724OMlCr/6XM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737718667; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DOgxYuNJGR/6wh6nuju19thFYosNZhn+4J/myN/Jx1o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iGhY/PtAhte8k/NjqTCgAUogdiD4Qz6klrZ5wIvif2vMbQO7KK6lBgmvwcYQ98wUM+83S+dmuCHGBJnUk1UhEIW/n+HOQMeqKyYHeTVAnFtKCCvuLfSGpG27BxmIUV/s9G2OsPUfj6Xpcerf6GjsK88aJmkgPnLd/wnfRLVMPE4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ish6hNS2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ish6hNS2" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 471B5C4CED2; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 11:37:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1737718666; bh=DOgxYuNJGR/6wh6nuju19thFYosNZhn+4J/myN/Jx1o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ish6hNS2rGMV45xVSjhRFpucP6YMoGERJEfGGTOWv7qTCTgWW655QSdxWDnv4oQ5Y iXt1lLsGmnWmQuayxwOoE75GKb72VxhtU5CTvBHp3ym+he14njZ0+1bYLoVZ2/ItjZ AcXzFIgo+oaPLie2CjFMw7Zfs0qmpV/N8aFWep71mVFCyx//UztERXSXQpBPE9l4f2 34yVG3+DRX5uUsUn3AG87EJ3MDE0HDISQCc3glr406Tq0yNDIlje/tWhbZqGm99gHu Lj/K1YqOnQdFAespmV/+M4EGsUf/Wr7HOEUrK0pn6wefsSM4qiTWYjboVKSzEQ18ms aLvPgPxDR/0/g== Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 11:37:43 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Cong Wang Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jhs@mojatatu.com, jiri@resnulli.us, quanglex97@gmail.com, mincho@theori.io, Cong Wang Subject: Re: [Patch net 2/4] Add test case to check for pfifo_tail_enqueue() behaviour when limit == 0 Message-ID: <20250124113743.GA34605@kernel.org> References: <20250124060740.356527-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> <20250124060740.356527-3-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250124060740.356527-3-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 10:07:38PM -0800, Cong Wang wrote: > From: Quang Le > > When limit == 0, pfifo_tail_enqueue() must drop new packet and > increase dropped packets count of scheduler. > > Signed-off-by: Quang Le > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang Hi Cong, all, This test is reporting "not ok" in the Netdev CI. # not ok 577 d774 - Check pfifo_head_drop qdisc enqueue behaviour when limit == 0 # Could not match regex pattern. Verify command output: # qdisc pfifo_head_drop 1: root refcnt 2 limit 0p # Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) # backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 ...