From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2055166F1A for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 17:42:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737999769; cv=none; b=c9T7+UCO2rXUt90TuTUHrLhinHM02D1mD5FFgbFZUxzu72rOt8p6N1gSneqhT/9hfSsRDPQEw77iCgEMXTQB717HDzreLKaXhcyfleojR1P5VCNxY6KtAg3P7qR2zfUlMHdBHKQM/gICaOj6ONAGcbH1f5zGTkvW07roEVDKTtY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737999769; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+GaeAUSMWZ4A3X5PbuQRiRWRpQk3A6nipAojdcxufRU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pSDe6tIoy9WWbt+kdZAlUTNuk3mkxxoZI/51lbmGwD//apr1X5yteyjJ4DB5QrN1iUN7LqsH0Ro60JtJAcxRAnIGeM/mK4fVM3SfTo7Qd6TqcVNJdKTjeiNaDBz6SSOp+AFgL3ytjZq6qs42dQZpQbq93a9ZrvJsUyXnP3LynsI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=oFX358ef; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="oFX358ef" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FC78C4CED2; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 17:42:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1737999768; bh=+GaeAUSMWZ4A3X5PbuQRiRWRpQk3A6nipAojdcxufRU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oFX358efwc3DfsvWJbikh7ppR1u7iZRGB6Zru4GWJlTtv77C9Ul4Jt2J74YXOfPQf ncoJ7EJNbE0X/fHViuJlkLmUB2NluvFFwysVTjVeIXrU4Qsu66MOCeXDDH8JTSZto1 7LikANewMHFw/HTSyhkRbUFR7Gu3vUH5tCYzS9+pzbFHKTk4bXRcPzg3k/TeTHlVf0 Msp+6vlyCr6HD4DW3zmHIKoBEJ0UNJ5CF+CqEXMZ7D3UQq3Dfh+Gg/igwlwquPaCgy WdC47emUXm6K1It8ccEB4vvRf8+D2LKZfu7II1sCTm0V94b/CrFCGO0Y50SuOaEYBl qGQ2GRWPfJuXQ== Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 09:42:47 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Przemek Kitszel Cc: "Singh, Krishneil K" , "intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org" , "Emil Tantilov" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Ahmed Zaki Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net v1 0/4] fix locking issue Message-ID: <20250127094247.40b169a1@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <95288bb1-8931-4d18-b8f6-25a4f6148afe@intel.com> References: <20241105184859.741473-1-tarun.k.singh@intel.com> <95288bb1-8931-4d18-b8f6-25a4f6148afe@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 09:11:41 +0100 Przemek Kitszel wrote: > @netdev > I would like to consider adding "in reset" state for the netdev, > to prevent such behavior in more civilized way though. Can you provide more context? We already have netif_device_detach()