From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0673918E351; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 21:03:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738011825; cv=none; b=b8kNiw7sLQDxXU0FJBXDTT/uOtt1ivQsD688hG5iZoW4t9S1flepyeOW92YC+aM+oPecB34lqAjCGKl9k5448i2vkEhNyywzkeIEPgNIDeL5wAoFsAoMXjEeXi8zmLO7llC/cm+Ohayhbtrrq+zWcRFQ0+HuG48GhF/GlrYXRME= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738011825; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WVG1MPhd1HOw3Gt5nUM041Hsql8yO2/kRnMQw0w2s+g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rjnZI/icT3zEZOKk/VTx1lrm6YszCOPocQr2vINnhYj8eNprnwTfYY/qDf0aQf9cz88EnnzMaQ/Lp9cbVEKwx+4Bnu+B1X0W48QD2BMT7292TG7AALg+VP6Trff8jHLckMSLjqKiAdc9N9hjgZVeDfnDk6JiUZmaD+KbtWAkZn8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=pkaE2m9I; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="pkaE2m9I" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6DFFC4CED2; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 21:03:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738011824; bh=WVG1MPhd1HOw3Gt5nUM041Hsql8yO2/kRnMQw0w2s+g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pkaE2m9IYX3BiHqcBoFLWU4//r7Wjk8TGvMJ92/b51qrSj02gFTXn+H1tmtfaCvON az4e9drcle1/kXlP4KKGiG5Da4zjh0KxAhxn1HPEMdDv78oVpa4Bb9HqeOj+bpQDBM C7AiBzDupLGTGePtkfanyUrmCKEJKjvXPoeZkAvkqQ5h/rsoZ1VG/jmvGCioT4znJ1 bKrkqoumWFBJ7OB03jR3gR9o+xIl6yTR4okl/ToDpwfzfsKisKRiLYSPTfqaIiJyT3 QdLw1u0nzKqxNdLF15EMevuQTiIRRTOk55tN6lk9a7w4OXXoosUVEPFGtR7EOZRn58 LJywnw+L9rMaw== Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:03:42 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Huacai Chen Cc: Andrew Lunn , "Russell King (Oracle)" , Kunihiko Hayashi , Alexandre Torgue , Jose Abreu , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] net: stmmac: Fix usage of maximum queue number macros Message-ID: <20250127130342.4e5d1f9e@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250127092450.2945611-1-hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 21:47:29 +0800 Huacai Chen wrote: > > There is another aspect to this. We are adding warnings saying that > > the device tree blob is broken. That should encourage users to upgrade > > their device tree blob. But most won't find any newer version. If this > > goes into net-next, the roll out will be a lot slower, developers on > > the leading edge will find the DT issue and submit a DT patch. By the > > time this is in a distro kernel, maybe most of the DT issues will > > already be fixed? > Goto net or goto net-next are both fine to me, I just think this > series should be backported to stable branches. There are lots of > patches backported even though they are less important than this > series (maybe not in the network subsystem). Please remove the Fixes tags when reposting. -- pw-bot: defer