netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, gerhard@engleder-embedded.com,
	jasowang@redhat.com, leiyang@redhat.com,
	xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com, mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v3 1/4] net: protect queue -> napi linking with netdev_lock()
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:37:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250127133756.413efb24@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250121191047.269844-2-jdamato@fastly.com>

On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 19:10:41 +0000 Joe Damato wrote:
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> 
> netdev netlink is the only reader of netdev_{,rx_}queue->napi,
> and it already holds netdev->lock. Switch protection of the
> writes to netdev->lock as well.
> 
> Add netif_queue_set_napi_locked() for API completeness,
> but the expectation is that most current drivers won't have
> to worry about locking any more. Today they jump thru hoops
> to take rtnl_lock.

I started having second thoughts about this patch, sorry to say.
NAPI objects were easy to protect with the lock because there's
a clear registration and unregistration API. Queues OTOH are made
visible by the netif_set_real_num_queues() call, which is tricky 
to protect with the instance lock. Queues are made visible, then
we configure them.

My thinking changed a bit, I think we should aim to protect all
ndos and ethtool ops with the instance lock. Stanislav and Saeed
seem to be working on that:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/Z5LhKdNMO5CvAvZf@mini-arch/
so hopefully that doesn't cause too much of a delay.
But you may need to rework this series further :(

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-27 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-21 19:10 [RFC net-next v3 0/4] virtio_net: Link queues to NAPIs Joe Damato
2025-01-21 19:10 ` [RFC net-next v3 1/4] net: protect queue -> napi linking with netdev_lock() Joe Damato
2025-01-27 21:37   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-01-27 22:21     ` Joe Damato
2025-01-21 19:10 ` [RFC net-next v3 2/4] virtio_net: Prepare for NAPI to queue mapping Joe Damato
2025-01-22  6:12   ` Jason Wang
2025-01-22 17:40     ` Joe Damato
2025-01-23  2:40       ` Jason Wang
2025-01-23  2:47         ` Joe Damato
2025-01-24  1:14           ` Jason Wang
2025-01-24 20:19             ` Joe Damato
2025-01-26  8:04               ` Jason Wang
2025-01-27 17:52                 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-27 19:31                   ` Joe Damato
2025-01-27 21:33                     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-27 22:07                       ` Joe Damato
2025-01-27 22:24                         ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-27 22:32                           ` Joe Damato
2025-01-21 19:10 ` [RFC net-next v3 3/4] virtio_net: Map NAPIs to queues Joe Damato
2025-01-21 20:13   ` Gerhard Engleder
2025-01-22  6:13   ` Jason Wang
2025-01-21 19:10 ` [RFC net-next v3 4/4] virtio_net: Use persistent NAPI config Joe Damato
2025-01-21 20:18   ` Gerhard Engleder
2025-01-22  6:13   ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250127133756.413efb24@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gerhard@engleder-embedded.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=leiyang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).