From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62F801804A for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 16:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738601188; cv=none; b=VX4fRd/YZEUVd+qcYX5T1WQR9BrHDy/xh5ofUMiF2FMOVgOOC8mQ0uFbdRxg6Grg81lhA0aEMFboi4sqCloo9bZ6sCPjdtqcijf847lPHOIanDqqImOeEC35C81nlYdzTbN9dWJsrAcuJ0m6dCrI3DOiBJZtRT2Ny5RJTkGKbMk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738601188; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2x58gP+L9Aq2+tW4TV+bMLf08YoiRxLzIS/yjXmu/F4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Oz9ODojFPII6luZ+ZOzX3lqssijuqs2KUqt5gGFYHETJvDwBle1+/gxG3D4hSdOkrgLE8/WeX5G0AESN2SJbdgmqGE2cd/ek5pRJ9P7TtueMBDQSDhfl40fJdnDs3ipRLX0dN8jmSdyxWokWpSM83xd11+OmHlxOWwPs00pOWXk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZVxUArQx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZVxUArQx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0DAFCC4CED2; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 16:46:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738601188; bh=2x58gP+L9Aq2+tW4TV+bMLf08YoiRxLzIS/yjXmu/F4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZVxUArQx9wuP94rVG7t5N+ONfWiyRHqhsOzP/B/9a6jPTP7m8xbwiHS8iiQjLuLWH uRxs5UTGL9xuOc8DJFFt8ZH/8wGE6MANUTZ6YYkF16HpWlDYsN2MKRMHkZRrXOx/ym 46jwaDaLS1BP/7N0v7vvgHiFZRweCvltZQswpd+ozrvhHWrlfWo8qrwTeZ8RZdMpPT pw+dn8y/fHpgZPolmN3oGxy0kUejhHqD2CUiG47NtPxHo4iF0MRMkM808M6mD4/WBU RH6f6bQ0kDfidWpAjh57mWaAstVzWLR9VLulgk0Atcc7hNsQVv0gtMTywgj04L3TLP Gr0aDPBTfMlPA== Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 08:46:27 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Simon Horman , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] MAINTAINERS: add a sample ethtool section entry Message-ID: <20250203084627.54982995@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <9f6c2d87-bb45-4c95-af93-7d2ca5f1dcc3@lunn.ch> References: <20250202021155.1019222-1-kuba@kernel.org> <20250202021155.1019222-2-kuba@kernel.org> <20250203105647.GG234677@kernel.org> <9f6c2d87-bb45-4c95-af93-7d2ca5f1dcc3@lunn.ch> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 14:29:23 +0100 Andrew Lunn wrote: > > In the first instance this seems like a good direction to go in to me. > > My only slight concern is that we might see an explosion in entries. > > I don't think that will happen. I don't think we really have many > sections of ethtool which people personally care about, always try to > review across all drivers. Agreed, FWIW. > Even if it does explode, so what. Is ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl the > bottleneck in any workflows? Only concern there could be the keywords, we had issues with regexps being too expensive in the past. There are plenty examples of how to do them right now, tho.