From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Jacob Moroni <mail@jakemoroni.com>
Cc: Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@marvell.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: atlantic: fix warning during hot unplug
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 10:02:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250203100236.GB234677@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250202220921.13384-2-mail@jakemoroni.com>
On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 05:09:21PM -0500, Jacob Moroni wrote:
> Firmware deinitialization performs MMIO accesses which are not
> necessary if the device has already been removed. In some cases,
> these accesses happen via readx_poll_timeout_atomic which ends up
> timing out, resulting in a warning at hw_atl2_utils_fw.c:112:
>
> [ 104.595913] Call Trace:
> [ 104.595915] <TASK>
> [ 104.595918] ? show_regs+0x6c/0x80
> [ 104.595923] ? __warn+0x8d/0x150
> [ 104.595925] ? aq_a2_fw_deinit+0xcf/0xe0 [atlantic]
> [ 104.595934] ? report_bug+0x182/0x1b0
> [ 104.595938] ? handle_bug+0x6e/0xb0
> [ 104.595940] ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x80
> [ 104.595942] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20
> [ 104.595944] ? aq_a2_fw_deinit+0xcf/0xe0 [atlantic]
> [ 104.595952] ? aq_a2_fw_deinit+0xcf/0xe0 [atlantic]
> [ 104.595959] aq_nic_deinit.part.0+0xbd/0xf0 [atlantic]
> [ 104.595964] aq_nic_deinit+0x17/0x30 [atlantic]
> [ 104.595970] aq_ndev_close+0x2b/0x40 [atlantic]
> [ 104.595975] __dev_close_many+0xad/0x160
> [ 104.595978] dev_close_many+0x99/0x170
> [ 104.595979] unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x18b/0xb20
> [ 104.595981] ? __call_rcu_common+0xcd/0x700
> [ 104.595984] unregister_netdevice_queue+0xc6/0x110
> [ 104.595986] unregister_netdev+0x1c/0x30
> [ 104.595988] aq_pci_remove+0xb1/0xc0 [atlantic]
>
> Fix this by skipping firmware deinitialization altogether if the
> PCI device is no longer present.
>
> Tested with an AQC113 attached via Thunderbolt by performing
> repeated unplug cycles while traffic was running via iperf.
>
Hi Jacob,
As a fix for net a Fixes tag should go here
(immediately before your signed-off-by line, no blank line in between).
I'm wondering if this one is appropriate: the problem seems
to go all the way back to here.
Fixes: 97bde5c4f909 ("net: ethernet: aquantia: Support for NIC-specific code")
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Moroni <mail@jakemoroni.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_nic.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_nic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_nic.c
> index fe0e3e2a8117..e2ae95a01947 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_nic.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_nic.c
> @@ -1428,7 +1428,7 @@ void aq_nic_deinit(struct aq_nic_s *self, bool link_down)
> unsigned int i = 0U;
>
> if (!self)
> - goto err_exit;
> + return;
>
> for (i = 0U; i < self->aq_vecs; i++) {
> aq_vec = self->aq_vec[i];
This hunk, and the removal of the err_exit label, seem to be more
clean-up than addressing the bug described in the patch description.
I don't think they belong in this patch. But could be candidates for
a follow-up patch targeted at net-next.
> @@ -1441,13 +1441,14 @@ void aq_nic_deinit(struct aq_nic_s *self, bool link_down)
> aq_ptp_ring_free(self);
> aq_ptp_free(self);
>
> - if (likely(self->aq_fw_ops->deinit) && link_down) {
> - mutex_lock(&self->fwreq_mutex);
> - self->aq_fw_ops->deinit(self->aq_hw);
> - mutex_unlock(&self->fwreq_mutex);
> + /* May be invoked during hot unplug. */
> + if (pci_device_is_present(self->pdev)) {
> + if (likely(self->aq_fw_ops->deinit) && link_down) {
Maybe not important, but I would have written this as a single if
condition rather than two.
Also, not really appropriate to change in this patch as it's not part
of the bug, but I'm not sure that likely() is appropriate here:
is this a fast path?
> + mutex_lock(&self->fwreq_mutex);
> + self->aq_fw_ops->deinit(self->aq_hw);
> + mutex_unlock(&self->fwreq_mutex);
> + }
> }
> -
> -err_exit:;
> }
>
> void aq_nic_free_vectors(struct aq_nic_s *self)
--
pw-bot: changes-requested
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-03 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-02 22:09 [PATCH net] net: atlantic: fix warning during hot unplug Jacob Moroni
2025-02-03 8:55 ` [EXTERNAL] " Igor Russkikh
2025-02-03 10:02 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-02-03 14:34 ` Jacob S. Moroni
2025-02-03 14:36 ` [PATCH net v2] " Jacob Moroni
2025-02-04 10:54 ` Simon Horman
2025-02-04 22:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250203100236.GB234677@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=irusskikh@marvell.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mail@jakemoroni.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).