From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03C901FF7CA; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 22:23:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738621424; cv=none; b=Y7Zmb7DR9luU9dRKBj4aAZWdTQp1ih7CqGsPvJMm/lzveFavaun27Tx6Og0RJbcIYE+DJdSjzqnNPdSQ8GvyOo11Z+LbmMY42DI0nj4GgMQqO1LR1NUCMkjU+ghA7AuSwcBaBkiFzM0PF1IZzHcZOs2s5zmQhLY5WP2bZxnIQv0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738621424; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QDO9GVeXAOaaRZkSWSLtvHPPP50q6hnF5jk/+ZuAFCo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AtHcXGy/AUPOKX93kJQlB7POW5ryy6qxCCTDCdxeOLOkaEOdlU6Tzn05rZMxJE9adn9yQNyOcmaoogI3Cz89aLlg7tOjBEtGO1QXoYAckI7caDODisM/UIow+q+ImGHJwV4EE0J0FzqY/5eFcLx0zQWopjbfYYwYmvXUDkqtv7M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=odAS0O7+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="odAS0O7+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2C93C4CED2; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 22:23:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738621423; bh=QDO9GVeXAOaaRZkSWSLtvHPPP50q6hnF5jk/+ZuAFCo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=odAS0O7+0BpU5Lz+GlKYMGQ6c4ARoLckDjtLnhs8REL6A5uZgF1zTxV5NDNXJD8om M8fSprvOVg3y5Fr9qU/2ggqb/XMEPTVVcO5GS/cP5vbjoJ/FaBi1czc80yrdigPSaU sht0CkU3zWTLkYPlFF8eRXXnEGVC9YAFsqj3S+jtwd8OdbiQUJXAmK4YZ8og5R2SnJ ZrJ9dSpKHeNgb/Q59p2FDVNYhY3x9S6FOslm2m88S4Ob4Ah44GDMJFp/ZzloWLRqhc Fi1sDvBpk28JWpKvKy3s42spNVNCkwNjQJPf4TP1C2VfsZhqjXveKY1PLInfYyOKei f5XmO3mH2VpOg== Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 14:23:42 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Russell King (Oracle)" Cc: Steven Price , Kunihiko Hayashi , "David S. Miller" , Alexandre Torgue , Andrew Lunn , Eric Dumazet , Maxime Coquelin , Jose Abreu , Paolo Abeni , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Furong Xu <0x1207@gmail.com>, Petr Tesarik , Serge Semin , Yanteng Si , Xi Ruoyao Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: Allow zero for [tr]x_fifo_size Message-ID: <20250203142342.145af901@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250203093419.25804-1-steven.price@arm.com> <811ea27c-c1c3-454a-b3d9-fa4cd6d57e44@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 11:16:34 +0000 Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > > I've no opinion whether the original series "had value" - I'm just > > trying to fix the breakage that entailed. My first attempt at a patch > > was indeed a (partial) revert, but Andrew was keen to find a better > > solution[1]. > > There are two ways to fix the breakage - either revert the original > patches (which if they have little value now would be the sensible > approach IMHO) +1, I also vote revert FWIW