From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f52.google.com (mail-pj1-f52.google.com [209.85.216.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 408EF21E087 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 05:56:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.52 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738735018; cv=none; b=lD0bAyoJACE7H3xie7KtClRMpWLUyTC87S0yaxhDBrVC75p98EPphefTq7nUy1M4X/ZOf+nC8saKuGinhNRQClgyry4AEopjfe2IkE+oRHZ24CTvANgggGJWmjO5twzI4EmbcCeCyIDVhEBH4IF460ZBOioMSkD3ijD7z7/7nEM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738735018; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MrX4MfuXKWj5ytSNxwkhkKn37o5v+Re4uJYrYKu/+kc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IMTdJGljGEYLFI5WkxWsJ4cN+57Y6w5FwiRNFIfyFMmFAu99qmChA6INdqxJLfgnx49UvS3rbSfe7z9rUUQcYQbwfB2Ic4IEUlvNCt/s+5PNMjhVqjqSJUBUkWYYKxXkG0Gr/V2zZ6+8KubD2hz4xUwVACwg3TnL0reQ8PsJRYo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=networkplumber.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=networkplumber.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=PvgD56ON; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.52 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=networkplumber.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=networkplumber.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="PvgD56ON" Received: by mail-pj1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2f9d5e0e365so1550190a91.2 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 21:56:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1738735006; x=1739339806; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Ns0GvBmqZ/ALUPGbyiEvtLecO6r/ScOTIN440LsR8U0=; b=PvgD56ON9ydeM2frr0Pss/6EhwfrpkPotumZZBi9t9hWG23SK+BTxTll+89eVAGSWd 3kmqGfQQG0d0BGoqKYHmLzz9iqIEa6sGy4dvpTjTVP3xJzK8zMtOv/rsUbL76G/lX9eO K4I4KiRMbd22Pg1ak/CvdWT7PFzyXidj9qDpOFNzrnwap0X6vHzzfgnP59LB4o73WZ/W F9JpdZZLDEfN/hifDXy7onJtBq7PLxkJvbE38gScAFOXSRrJND2D9PrRjJQHdZNo9ZXR 7/fmohklHSn72E9v+U91y1cJK86brk1XM/gCJh7YKcAyWfBxVNXzbbUqYurCyj9i68wW JZJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1738735006; x=1739339806; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ns0GvBmqZ/ALUPGbyiEvtLecO6r/ScOTIN440LsR8U0=; b=JkvgnQflgMhEWDXsZr/OvNY/BQ7LNhzCSCMqK9Dc+Kdg46we5MXWy/RyjjIy5gdoEE 7FzcKj9DB6TbeoREFwEhPBlyqJupohlaHG+A/W3Wocuf5cPF3MksYOEHAlDTSo2/CJ53 CCsmLnuGIEOi6DMVN2wsaYSJG/+L3X42XmfeuczPRA4P+CVQMcBvm4SLE2YuDqshwo99 LUN3HnX8NZ4AU1Rr5oMe+xaCqfyBD5PrmDhe7TmAY3/Wt2yeaColqrv6m6jozvUKO4qb v1Zk6Q04wxObYLBHCDTbfRKEJK9sGqLiQ3n8Bz2mggNO/JqK6NP+nERYXLG5OulhJzjq TQdQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVjn2lgEc4AZCQyYNNch5CeqhVkrSfBcX6RurVP1BesbwdH46SBcj4czJ57Zgm30R146/ypwcg=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzPDYm2FMopIYH/P1YbpF/Ky1lyjV7ghAMKHyUy+cQ0XM9WzNVi S5sRistVA9NbY5ZC3t3tF9d5I6dDo+/LGUlxkOmmLelXwBjMXkptO0pE017FEIM= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvIEGWyDCeQzxtZnz5Kr7D7Add+LIDsgytJ3WLghNOcIRlGOJAvq9Cgh3jHPxJ uHB34WJpy02EyuT6SX4ciNeoy9ZuyweLwN36ZB3e+0iGQKTz8vr4znF5DnawVpRE8vM31DP0CVr IFhXQwCgqTha+l6kO6VV8M6QjmUUeaD+0TzObo3a3NFxT5y4Mwe6VXZqH0diKjyeUMVodTRqczH 3pPB/K2AP2lurbraT2i5iNIIqGnEtjLrqoVog6EGVTLacQdbnN4pjzOfoP+edx9qYk5rXXq21mS WrTIFtIwgKVf0rBb5sZDudhcvtxGuVHUzFd5WMUKUxjMRBHULnsbhKCFX5ZUxapn7z+p X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG04CF5Qx7s6xBWVy3NG/NTiwTMF528huN8sMDzFrqgklOtDQvD8VpkkKg5ZaYCNCuNQm5zHg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:4642:b0:72d:8fa2:99ac with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-730351255c8mr2340033b3a.13.1738735006329; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 21:56:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-72fe6a18cb1sm11561432b3a.169.2025.02.04.21.56.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Feb 2025 21:56:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 21:56:43 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Shradha Gupta Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Wei Liu , Dexuan Cui , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Long Li , Konstantin Taranov , Souradeep Chakrabarti , Erick Archer , Shradha Gupta Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hv_netvsc: Use VF's tso_max_size value when data path is VF Message-ID: <20250204215643.41d3f00f@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <1738729316-25922-1-git-send-email-shradhagupta@linux.microsoft.com> References: <1738729257-25510-1-git-send-email-shradhagupta@linux.microsoft.com> <1738729316-25922-1-git-send-email-shradhagupta@linux.microsoft.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 20:21:55 -0800 Shradha Gupta wrote: > On Azure, increasing VF's TCP segment size to up-to GSO_MAX_SIZE > is not possible without allowing the same for netvsc NIC > (as the NICs are bonded together). For bonded NICs, the min of the max > segment size of the members is propagated in the stack. > > Therefore, we use netif_set_tso_max_size() to set max segment size > to VF's segment size for netvsc too, when the data path is switched over > to the VF > Tested on azure env with Accelerated Networking enabled and disabled. > > Signed-off-by: Shradha Gupta > Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang Since datapath can change at anytime (ie hot remove of VF). How does TCP stack react to GSO max size changing underneath it. Is it like a path MTU change where some packets are lost until TCP retries and has to rediscover?