netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Bharat Bhushan <bharatb.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	Ayush Sawal <ayush.sawal@chelsio.com>,
	Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@marvell.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Geetha sowjanya <gakula@marvell.com>,
	hariprasad <hkelam@marvell.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	Louis Peens <louis.peens@corigine.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, oss-drivers@corigine.com,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@chelsio.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
	Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@marvell.com>,
	Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Ilia Lin <ilia.lin@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next 1/5] xfrm: delay initialization of offload path till its actually requested
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 10:54:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250206085443.GO74886@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeCc_kfRt8LhKgRmLsaaSmJs94hjH85DxCjEnJA6OQc5S5XXw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 02:16:08PM +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> Hi Leon,
> 
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 11:50 PM Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> >
> > XFRM offload path is probed even if offload isn't needed at all. Let's
> > make sure that x->type_offload pointer stays NULL for such path to
> > reduce ambiguity.
> >
> > Fixes: 9d389d7f84bb ("xfrm: Add a xfrm type offload.")
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >  include/net/xfrm.h     | 12 +++++++++++-
> >  net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> >  net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c  | 22 +++++++++-------------
> >  net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c   |  2 +-
> >  4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

<...>

> > +       x->type_offload = xfrm_get_type_offload(x->id.proto, x->props.family);
> > +       if (!x->type_offload) {

<...>

> > +               xfrm_put_type_offload(x->type_offload);
> > +               x->type_offload = NULL;
> 
> We always set type_offload to NULL. Can we move type_offload = NULL in
> xfrm_put_type_offload() ?

We can, but it will require change to xfrm_get_type_offload() too,
otherwise we will get asymmetrical get/put.

Do you want something like that?
int xfrm_get_type_offload(struct xfrm_state *x);
void xfrm_put_type_offload(struct xfrm_state *x);

Thansk

> 
> Thanks
> -Bharat
> 
> >                 /* User explicitly requested packet offload mode and configured
> >                  * policy in addition to the XFRM state. So be civil to users,
> >                  * and return an error instead of taking fallback path.
> > diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> > index ad2202fa82f3..568fe8df7741 100644
> > --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> > +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> > @@ -424,11 +424,12 @@ void xfrm_unregister_type_offload(const struct xfrm_type_offload *type,
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_unregister_type_offload);
> >
> > -static const struct xfrm_type_offload *
> > -xfrm_get_type_offload(u8 proto, unsigned short family, bool try_load)
> > +const struct xfrm_type_offload *xfrm_get_type_offload(u8 proto,
> > +                                                     unsigned short family)
> >  {
> >         const struct xfrm_type_offload *type = NULL;
> >         struct xfrm_state_afinfo *afinfo;
> > +       bool try_load = true;
> >
> >  retry:
> >         afinfo = xfrm_state_get_afinfo(family);
> > @@ -456,11 +457,7 @@ xfrm_get_type_offload(u8 proto, unsigned short family, bool try_load)
> >
> >         return type;
> >  }
> > -
> > -static void xfrm_put_type_offload(const struct xfrm_type_offload *type)
> > -{
> > -       module_put(type->owner);
> > -}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_get_type_offload);
> >
> >  static const struct xfrm_mode xfrm4_mode_map[XFRM_MODE_MAX] = {
> >         [XFRM_MODE_BEET] = {
> > @@ -609,8 +606,6 @@ static void ___xfrm_state_destroy(struct xfrm_state *x)
> >         kfree(x->coaddr);
> >         kfree(x->replay_esn);
> >         kfree(x->preplay_esn);
> > -       if (x->type_offload)
> > -               xfrm_put_type_offload(x->type_offload);
> >         if (x->type) {
> >                 x->type->destructor(x);
> >                 xfrm_put_type(x->type);
> > @@ -784,6 +779,9 @@ void xfrm_dev_state_free(struct xfrm_state *x)
> >         struct xfrm_dev_offload *xso = &x->xso;
> >         struct net_device *dev = READ_ONCE(xso->dev);
> >
> > +       xfrm_put_type_offload(x->type_offload);
> > +       x->type_offload = NULL;
> > +
> >         if (dev && dev->xfrmdev_ops) {
> >                 spin_lock_bh(&xfrm_state_dev_gc_lock);
> >                 if (!hlist_unhashed(&x->dev_gclist))
> > @@ -3122,7 +3120,7 @@ u32 xfrm_state_mtu(struct xfrm_state *x, int mtu)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xfrm_state_mtu);
> >
> > -int __xfrm_init_state(struct xfrm_state *x, bool init_replay, bool offload,
> > +int __xfrm_init_state(struct xfrm_state *x, bool init_replay,
> >                       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> >  {
> >         const struct xfrm_mode *inner_mode;
> > @@ -3178,8 +3176,6 @@ int __xfrm_init_state(struct xfrm_state *x, bool init_replay, bool offload,
> >                 goto error;
> >         }
> >
> > -       x->type_offload = xfrm_get_type_offload(x->id.proto, family, offload);
> > -
> >         err = x->type->init_state(x, extack);
> >         if (err)
> >                 goto error;
> > @@ -3229,7 +3225,7 @@ int xfrm_init_state(struct xfrm_state *x)
> >  {
> >         int err;
> >
> > -       err = __xfrm_init_state(x, true, false, NULL);
> > +       err = __xfrm_init_state(x, true, NULL);
> >         if (!err)
> >                 x->km.state = XFRM_STATE_VALID;
> >
> > diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
> > index 08c6d6f0179f..82a768500999 100644
> > --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
> > +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
> > @@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ static struct xfrm_state *xfrm_state_construct(struct net *net,
> >                         goto error;
> >         }
> >
> > -       err = __xfrm_init_state(x, false, attrs[XFRMA_OFFLOAD_DEV], extack);
> > +       err = __xfrm_init_state(x, false, extack);
> >         if (err)
> >                 goto error;
> >
> > --
> > 2.48.1
> >
> >
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-06  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-05 18:20 [PATCH ipsec-next 0/5] Support PTMU in tunnel mode for packet offload Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-05 18:20 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 1/5] xfrm: delay initialization of offload path till its actually requested Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-06  8:46   ` Bharat Bhushan
2025-02-06  8:54     ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2025-02-06 13:59       ` Bharat Bhushan
2025-02-06 14:26         ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-05 18:20 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 2/5] xfrm: simplify SA initialization routine Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-12 11:56   ` Steffen Klassert
2025-02-12 18:30     ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-14  9:29       ` Steffen Klassert
2025-02-14 11:14         ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-05 18:20 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 3/5] xfrm: rely on XFRM offload Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-18 20:39   ` Zhu Yanjun
2025-02-05 18:20 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 4/5] xfrm: provide common xdo_dev_offload_ok callback implementation Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-16  9:33   ` Zhu Yanjun
2025-02-16 11:07     ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-16 12:36       ` Zhu Yanjun
2025-02-05 18:20 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 5/5] xfrm: check for PMTU in tunnel mode for packet offload Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250206085443.GO74886@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=ayush.sawal@chelsio.com \
    --cc=bbhushan2@marvell.com \
    --cc=bharat@chelsio.com \
    --cc=bharatb.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gakula@marvell.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=hkelam@marvell.com \
    --cc=ilia.lin@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=louis.peens@corigine.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oss-drivers@corigine.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sbhatta@marvell.com \
    --cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).