From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/7] tcp: only initialize sockcm tsflags field
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:34:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250206193521.2285488-2-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250206193521.2285488-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
TCP only reads the tsflags field. Don't bother initializing others.
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
---
Another option is to entirely avoid sockcm_cookie in the tcp hot path.
Limit its use to the sock_cmsg_send branch:
@@ -1123,13 +1123,17 @@ int tcp_sendmsg_locked(struct sock *sk, struct
msghdr *msg, size_t size)
/* 'common' sending to sendq */
}
- sockcm_init(&sockc, sk);
+ tsflags = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags);
if (msg->msg_controllen) {
+ struct sockcm_cookie sockc = { .tsflags = tsflags };
+
err = sock_cmsg_send(sk, msg, &sockc);
if (unlikely(err)) {
err = -EINVAL;
goto out_err;
}
+
+ tsflags = sockc.tsflags;
This involves a bit more rework, to have sock_tx_timestamp take a u32
tsflags directly.
---
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 0d704bda6c41..1f94b4e6c7ec 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int tcp_sendmsg_locked(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size)
/* 'common' sending to sendq */
}
- sockcm_init(&sockc, sk);
+ sockc = (struct sockcm_cookie) { .tsflags = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags)};
if (msg->msg_controllen) {
err = sock_cmsg_send(sk, msg, &sockc);
if (unlikely(err)) {
--
2.48.1.502.g6dc24dfdaf-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-06 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-06 19:34 [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: deduplicate cookie logic Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-06 19:34 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2025-02-06 19:34 ` [PATCH net-next 2/7] net: initialize mark in sockcm_init Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-06 19:34 ` [PATCH net-next 3/7] ipv4: initialize inet socket cookies with sockcm_init Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-06 19:34 ` [PATCH net-next 4/7] ipv4: remove get_rttos Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-07 0:59 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-07 17:33 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-08 9:24 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-06 19:34 ` [PATCH net-next 5/7] icmp: reflect tos through ip cookie rather than updating inet_sk Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-07 1:01 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-08 10:40 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-06 19:34 ` [PATCH net-next 6/7] ipv6: replace ipcm6_init calls with ipcm6_init_sk Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-06 19:34 ` [PATCH net-next 7/7] ipv6: initialize inet socket cookies with sockcm_init Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250206193521.2285488-2-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).