From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A9E31A7264; Sat, 8 Feb 2025 13:20:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739020838; cv=none; b=u4wmEI2uDrkMVJ432IPU68j25Kx9QFgYVfgU9Ow4jVU98nHx7vGwuMe2jim9MyF17CLbWZicYoL6OiCswWAZ6jzZv0WV5zUpL6JuG/Iq3GGhqMpats8bc0fm1c50ZtTa037LtuLINEk+xtqEEOwcBRh0wl0i4ewHwH0hgvgIPdQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739020838; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9W1Za/kbQu2xjBOIJYW7uwANkTVDwhxj/uoxldA8a54=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nh8Xv/4U/1KCMb0rd/m78bwupbnc6jLosrbB6ErD3WNY4jf950SlnjyjHpxbMZ7/Pw0an+hodFS3n9CUQ2BkzNWQxa6lDGvL63O65YK8YQyYGi25MgmabzIYRdBIyQBGVKbEk3Tb/OX4vXn2d7jKekfqGNOS1Jl9jwWx9SRsVQ8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=RrOIag8i; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="RrOIag8i" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E52FAC4CED6; Sat, 8 Feb 2025 13:20:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739020837; bh=9W1Za/kbQu2xjBOIJYW7uwANkTVDwhxj/uoxldA8a54=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RrOIag8iqPc6KucVE91+M9OmAQtQ+pTpaePLyLuUomKErjy7CfkIoji0E2gJGBrPP juxtLBHD4HXGM+K2063t/St1rKXOYVYo2GJgEdWTCyCHAGX43DGvMJJIssiVRh0vdh naUzKVmpMN6/8o6jJHrA5XRi6FPUVwpCQCHT4Eresz0CpkfJud0IUbEuT6cnMvvWEJ F5lZE8DaR8bbeeC+a0Zaff3qqIWzgDvOPYXTtwoKZASCtLqZ99Jb+2CCE2ewI8su1a NZ7Qr23h/O7RZZBcQQC+CIbYF3LigoEkwoBcQR/tZpK5pZAvGGr9qE5ofDljpaqJJs vYWfToR/We03g== Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2025 13:20:22 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Ulf Hansson , Bartosz Golaszewski , David Lechner , Linus Walleij , Andy Shevchenko , Geert Uytterhoeven , Lars-Peter Clausen , Michael Hennerich , Peter Rosin , Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Vinod Koul , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Nuno =?UTF-8?B?U8Oh?= , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] gpiolib: add gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep Message-ID: <20250208132022.564e7a46@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20250206-gpio-set-array-helper-v2-0-1c5f048f79c3@baylibre.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.48; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:20:16 +0200 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 11:48=E2=80=AFAM Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 at 08:49, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:= =20 > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 11:48=E2=80=AFPM David Lechner wrote: =20 >=20 > ... >=20 > > > > Maintainers, if you prefer to have this go through the gpio tree, p= lease > > > > give your Acked-by:, otherwise I will resend what is left after the= next > > > > kernel release. =20 >=20 > > > I can provide an immutable branch for the entire series for everyone > > > to pull or I can apply patch one, provide an immutable branch and > > > every subsystem can take their respective patches. What do you prefer= ? =20 > > > > The changes look small and trivial to me. I wouldn't mind if you take > > them all (at least for mmc). An immutable branch would be good, if it > > turns out that we need to pull them. =20 >=20 > +1 here, the potential user for immutable branch/tag is IIO. > The rest looks trivial and unlikely to have conflicts. Whilst I'm not sure if we'll need it, definitely good to have immutable branch just in case. There is another change to the ad7606 on list, but it's no where near this code so shouldn't be a problem however this goes in. My slight preference would be an immutable with a tag on patch 1. I'll pull that and apply the IIO ones on top. If you want to grab the lot though that should be fine as well. Jonathan >=20