From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0A13189B80; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739185781; cv=none; b=t2TmOEUxss+u4T8GLapTp9+82TRnXCSuixKHFG9D1nXiI5S2So471Zg8HZ8X5lVB1FD3zddX+mJjl6+O4hqbjlJDCksGRFV9TTY4yt+CItTlMWeUk5KfWtzNie9YBx4tmXZSyJWO0eVVUzm/Bs3CAkn7YasR3nlsuD3i6lTYFrk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739185781; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tdfBLbo2ufEVYX0IYmxEP5OjhHmRvkZtyjWgTNoblrg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gkzCQTJ9AW3oK9C7MyV5/sN1uLIJV8KDmArmWmaw9PP6E/kz2wlfCZ9dhQN7hOy2C2cr+XH2NjgtKrnRQ+khy+AAlNWoR/aZjVUZHTsiIShcrR6wQsyjCjVGzcvZBUv2RLvFlBae/9dfpbsne7YBqoTKyUY+838lsoSRSQNHJ54= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=cNF7Nax0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cNF7Nax0" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FD74C4CED1; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:09:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739185780; bh=tdfBLbo2ufEVYX0IYmxEP5OjhHmRvkZtyjWgTNoblrg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=cNF7Nax03oWlEfNri2Tt3DxBonSlyZ20uduGAa1jJ12jz/OlKMn0kyHxnGEHWRjUT kBGsjGcTAlxwTATifYPl05XyuF+kSVWs5mCMPymDzttrcRjIX+OSywThF1cGOAgNsY SFe4S1PMrQZP36DoWsvRAbzmuvta5ZgOLpA8gR55221UJ2flx/WQRrXzHJTEdz/aqz 98gX2QvrowQZVr8ZMnvIUN4PGmhO5NsRZ83i9lJRQegK1jbEEPRFvxUpBoE6ek5Hbv zMOCkw0YLJc6F6V2RuoaZvMe3QKOYvJEvZwCJkRskLSqujPVdU3quDycpIgtVRArxa OyP3UbFFMAnHA== Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:09:35 +0200 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Przemek Kitszel Cc: Tatyana Nikolova , jgg@nvidia.com, Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, Tony Nguyen , Simon Horman , Andrew Lunn , Eric Dumazet , "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [iwl-next,rdma v3 00/24] Add RDMA support for Intel IPU E2000 (GEN3) Message-ID: <20250210110935.GE17863@unreal> References: <20250207194931.1569-1-tatyana.e.nikolova@intel.com> <7e12c97d-8733-44df-b80e-2956c0e59dae@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7e12c97d-8733-44df-b80e-2956c0e59dae@intel.com> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:41:31AM +0100, Przemek Kitszel wrote: > On 2/7/25 20:49, Tatyana Nikolova wrote: > > This patch series is based on 6.14-rc1 and includes both netdev and RDMA > > patches for ease of review. It can also be viewed here [1]. A shared pull > > request will be sent for patches 1-7 following review. > > > > [...] > TLDR of my mail: could be take 1st patch prior to the rest? > > > V2 RFC series is at https://lwn.net/Articles/987141/. > > code there was mostly the same, and noone commented, I bet due > to the sheer size of the series It was very optimistic to expect for a review during holiday season and merge window, especially series of 25 patches which are marked as RFC. Thanks