From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 03/10] ethtool: allow ethtool op set_eee to set an NL extack message
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:08:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250210160823.2b9c233d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47a451a8-e253-460f-8e58-dfd2265a4941@gmail.com>
On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 00:22:08 +0100 Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Would this approach be acceptable?
I don't think so. We considered this for ndos, IIRC, global state can
lead to bugs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-11 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-12 13:24 [PATCH net-next v3 00/10] net: phy: improve phylib EEE handling Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-12 13:25 ` [PATCH net-next v3 01/10] net: phy: rename eee_broken_modes to eee_disabled_modes Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-12 13:27 ` [PATCH net-next v3 02/10] net: phy: rename phy_set_eee_broken to phy_disable_eee_mode Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-12 13:28 ` [PATCH net-next v3 03/10] ethtool: allow ethtool op set_eee to set an NL extack message Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-14 23:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15 12:31 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-01-15 17:46 ` Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-15 17:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-08 23:22 ` Heiner Kallweit
2025-02-11 0:08 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-01-12 13:29 ` [PATCH net-next v3 04/10] net: phy: c45: improve handling of disabled EEE modes in ethtool functions Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-12 13:30 ` [PATCH net-next v3 05/10] net: phy: move definition of phy_is_started before phy_disable_eee_mode Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-12 13:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 06/10] net: phy: improve phy_disable_eee_mode Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-12 13:32 ` [PATCH net-next v3 07/10] net: phy: remove disabled EEE modes from advertising in phy_probe Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-12 13:32 ` [PATCH net-next v3 08/10] net: phy: c45: Don't silently remove disabled EEE modes any longer when writing advertisement register Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-12 13:33 ` [PATCH net-next v3 09/10] net: phy: c45: use cached EEE advertisement in genphy_c45_ethtool_get_eee Heiner Kallweit
2025-01-12 13:34 ` [PATCH net-next v3 10/10] net: phy: c45: remove local advertisement parameter from genphy_c45_eee_is_active Heiner Kallweit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250210160823.2b9c233d@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).