From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 488081494C3 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 02:09:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739412554; cv=none; b=XS7/ysKV+VCJYdpKqfjNt4njMUaLf/sHO35efYcJRpiuVcZ919d08LH8CWMGvhvBKqlKL1itHrHia6pwIDwaJ+4LkEuvOgGeih8Hw4cmWEvhbh0D/3EEyi/p6UpnyEufA0j8VVR5j9fWdwdZ4tS0AhlPMLRVDIl9LXv0K1ePhG8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739412554; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MpXHxY8lXOL0qK4ijqCbhMb4gs1/hlqrSeyrCqMA+Ss=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QRqcm140+ahsXB+vhuzUttpTxbOp1cbLlm7AyxJP373ifRiv+69qZCEhCrV5XQLvs3mItVi54vndgpgFrA16CMOtC0lfU8lliWxMG7YeAOo0hsGQxLFn2T5BYpTydqAHM/QpGnsUm3+D7h6RSf9OXZK6FrPEjh+neFoEwfdvdRM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=TxF7CT3v; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TxF7CT3v" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90C75C4CEDF; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 02:09:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739412553; bh=MpXHxY8lXOL0qK4ijqCbhMb4gs1/hlqrSeyrCqMA+Ss=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TxF7CT3v2DQEsB05C5O52qGzhRkrCUn7ZsNYZsATZLZ+ho1oPfNaVnl5pzrJb31cB 4kAzkDXeajOIZHngMn6yeyUZAw7W/l4baiWHpD+9n8oQLn3Fggu0ub+9eGxzfu4tmq hdJpbeXhP/MivY/GV0Ly9t6M5LLlmUY89uKeNz7ioZ/xX7OZyLqS0GTu+yM1Cuqs2A CvWQVLOKrbGSEc/IxmD6bAPBnRL9/s1g0ynFANJk7btbCpm6WgT9QFrfiTgHbybd2f now6zc6uBmAKtp9BtxoG7bBnG9Jm+omHcWF6SzuRqZhyuj2AnK8IMwXQ065EDtDFhG RKaoXLpWwjSqg== Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:09:12 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "mengyuanlou@net-swift.com" Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jiawenwu@trustnetic.com, duanqiangwen@net-swift.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 5/6] net: ngbe: add sriov function support Message-ID: <20250212180912.7dc3e3cf@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250206103750.36064-1-mengyuanlou@net-swift.com> <20250206103750.36064-6-mengyuanlou@net-swift.com> <20250207171940.34824424@kernel.org> <09EC9A07-7DA7-4D3E-85EE-F56963B54A66@net-swift.com> <20250211140652.6f1a2aa9@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 19:06:52 +0800 mengyuanlou@net-swift.com wrote: > > The goal should be to make sure the right handler is register > > for the IRQ, or at least do the muxing earlier in a safe fashion. > > Not decide that it was a packet IRQ half way thru a function called > > ngbe_msix_other > > Whether the first way(Alloc 9 irq vectors, but only request_irq for 0 > and 8) can be better than reuse vector 0 in the real? I don't understand, sorry.