netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: Assert proper context while calling napi_schedule()
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 19:48:20 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250212194820.059dac6f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250212174329.53793-2-frederic@kernel.org>

On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:43:28 +0100 Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> napi_schedule() is expected to be called either:
> 
> * From an interrupt, where raised softirqs are handled on IRQ exit
> 
> * From a softirq disabled section, where raised softirqs are handled on
>   the next call to local_bh_enable().
> 
> * From a softirq handler, where raised softirqs are handled on the next
>   round in do_softirq(), or further deferred to a dedicated kthread.
> 
> Other bare tasks context may end up ignoring the raised NET_RX vector
> until the next random softirq handling opportunity, which may not
> happen before a while if the CPU goes idle afterwards with the tick
> stopped.
> 
> Report inappropriate calling contexts when neither of the three above
> conditions are met.

Looks like netcons is hitting this warning in netdevsim:

[   16.063196][  T219]  nsim_start_xmit+0x4e0/0x6f0 [netdevsim]
[   16.063219][  T219]  ? netif_skb_features+0x23e/0xa80
[   16.063237][  T219]  netpoll_start_xmit+0x3c3/0x670
[   16.063258][  T219]  __netpoll_send_skb+0x3e9/0x800
[   16.063287][  T219]  netpoll_send_skb+0x2a/0xa0
[   16.063298][  T219]  send_ext_msg_udp+0x286/0x350 [netconsole]
[   16.063325][  T219]  write_ext_msg+0x1c6/0x230 [netconsole]
[   16.063346][  T219]  console_emit_next_record+0x20d/0x430

https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-net-drv-dbg/results/990261/7-netcons-basic-sh/stderr

We gotta fix that first.

Please post the fixes for net, and then the warning in net-next.
So that we have some time to fix the uncovered warnings before
users are broadly exposed to them.
-- 
pw-bot: cr

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-13  3:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-12 17:43 [PATCH 0/2] net: Fix/prevent napi_schedule() call from bare task context Frederic Weisbecker
2025-02-12 17:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] net: Assert proper context while calling napi_schedule() Frederic Weisbecker
2025-02-13  3:48   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-02-13  9:58     ` Breno Leitao
2025-02-13 15:14       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-13 18:14         ` Breno Leitao
2025-02-13 19:04           ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-13 20:38             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-02-14 22:00               ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-15 21:16                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-02-14 13:05             ` Breno Leitao
2025-02-14 16:43         ` Breno Leitao
2025-02-14 22:10           ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-17 16:46             ` Breno Leitao
2025-02-17 17:37               ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-13 20:39     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-02-14 22:03       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-12 17:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] r8152: Call napi_schedule() from proper context Frederic Weisbecker
2025-02-12 20:49   ` Francois Romieu
2025-02-12 20:58     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-02-18 20:12       ` Paul Menzel
2025-04-27 20:50         ` Tobias Jakobi
2025-04-28 17:49           ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-28 20:26             ` Tobias Jakobi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250212194820.059dac6f@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=hayeswang@realtek.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).