netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org,
	willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, willemb@google.com,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v11 04/12] bpf: disable unsafe helpers in TX timestamping callbacks
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 09:00:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250214010038.54131-5-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250214010038.54131-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>

New TX timestamping sock_ops callbacks will be added in the
subsequent patch. Some of the existing BPF helpers will not
be safe to be used in the TX timestamping callbacks.

The bpf_sock_ops_setsockopt, bpf_sock_ops_getsockopt, and
bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set require owning the sock lock. TX
timestamping callbacks will not own the lock.

The bpf_sock_ops_load_hdr_opt needs the skb->data pointing
to the TCP header. This will not be true in the TX timestamping
callbacks.

At the beginning of these helpers, this patch checks the
bpf_sock->op to ensure these helpers are used by the existing
sock_ops callbacks only.

Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
---
 net/core/filter.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 8631036f6b64..7f56d0bbeb00 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -5523,6 +5523,11 @@ static int __bpf_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
+static bool is_locked_tcp_sock_ops(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *bpf_sock)
+{
+	return bpf_sock->op <= BPF_SOCK_OPS_WRITE_HDR_OPT_CB;
+}
+
 static int _bpf_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
 			   char *optval, int optlen)
 {
@@ -5673,6 +5678,9 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sock_addr_getsockopt_proto = {
 BPF_CALL_5(bpf_sock_ops_setsockopt, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, bpf_sock,
 	   int, level, int, optname, char *, optval, int, optlen)
 {
+	if (!is_locked_tcp_sock_ops(bpf_sock))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	return _bpf_setsockopt(bpf_sock->sk, level, optname, optval, optlen);
 }
 
@@ -5758,6 +5766,9 @@ static int bpf_sock_ops_get_syn(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *bpf_sock,
 BPF_CALL_5(bpf_sock_ops_getsockopt, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, bpf_sock,
 	   int, level, int, optname, char *, optval, int, optlen)
 {
+	if (!is_locked_tcp_sock_ops(bpf_sock))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) && level == SOL_TCP &&
 	    optname >= TCP_BPF_SYN && optname <= TCP_BPF_SYN_MAC) {
 		int ret, copy_len = 0;
@@ -5800,6 +5811,9 @@ BPF_CALL_2(bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, bpf_sock,
 	struct sock *sk = bpf_sock->sk;
 	int val = argval & BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS;
 
+	if (!is_locked_tcp_sock_ops(bpf_sock))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) || !sk_fullsock(sk))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -7609,6 +7623,9 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_sock_ops_load_hdr_opt, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, bpf_sock,
 	u8 search_kind, search_len, copy_len, magic_len;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (!is_locked_tcp_sock_ops(bpf_sock))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	/* 2 byte is the minimal option len except TCPOPT_NOP and
 	 * TCPOPT_EOL which are useless for the bpf prog to learn
 	 * and this helper disallow loading them also.
-- 
2.43.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-14  1:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-14  1:00 [PATCH bpf-next v11 00/12] net-timestamp: bpf extension to equip applications transparently Jason Xing
2025-02-14  1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 01/12] bpf: add networking timestamping support to bpf_get/setsockopt() Jason Xing
2025-02-14  1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 02/12] bpf: prepare the sock_ops ctx and call bpf prog for TX timestamping Jason Xing
2025-02-14  1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 03/12] bpf: prevent unsafe access to the sock fields in the BPF timestamping callback Jason Xing
2025-02-14  1:00 ` Jason Xing [this message]
2025-02-14  1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 05/12] net-timestamp: prepare for isolating two modes of SO_TIMESTAMPING Jason Xing
2025-02-14  1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 06/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_SCHED_OPT_CB callback Jason Xing
2025-02-14  1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 07/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_SW_OPT_CB callback Jason Xing
2025-02-14  1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 08/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_HW_OPT_CB callback Jason Xing
2025-02-15 15:06   ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-15 16:20     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-15 18:08       ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-15 22:23         ` Jason Xing
2025-02-15 22:58           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-15 23:10             ` Jason Xing
2025-02-16 14:36               ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-16 14:45                 ` Jason Xing
2025-02-16 14:48                   ` Jason Xing
2025-02-16 16:17                     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-18  0:56                     ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-18  4:51                       ` Jason Xing
2025-02-18  0:55                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-14  1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 09/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_ACK_OPT_CB callback Jason Xing
2025-02-14 20:33   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-14 23:16     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-14 23:41       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-15 15:16         ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-14  1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 10/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_SND_CB callback Jason Xing
2025-02-14  1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 11/12] bpf: support selective sampling for bpf timestamping Jason Xing
2025-02-15 15:10   ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-15 16:17     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-15 18:01       ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-15 21:11         ` Jason Xing
2025-02-14  1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 12/12] selftests/bpf: add simple bpf tests in the tx path for timestamping feature Jason Xing
2025-02-14 20:40   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-14 23:18     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-15 15:15   ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-15 16:17     ` Jason Xing
2025-02-15 18:01       ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-14 20:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 00/12] net-timestamp: bpf extension to equip applications transparently Martin KaFai Lau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250214010038.54131-5-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --to=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).