From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, willemb@google.com,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v11 05/12] net-timestamp: prepare for isolating two modes of SO_TIMESTAMPING
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 09:00:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250214010038.54131-6-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250214010038.54131-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
No functional changes here. Only add test to see if the orig_skb
matches the usage of application SO_TIMESTAMPING.
In this series, bpf timestamping and previous socket timestamping
are implemented in the same function __skb_tstamp_tx(). To test
the socket enables socket timestamping feature, this function
skb_tstamp_tx_report_so_timestamping() is added.
In the next patch, another check for bpf timestamping feature
will be introduced just like the above report function, namely,
skb_tstamp_tx_report_bpf_timestamping(). Then users will be able
to know the socket enables either or both of features.
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
---
net/core/skbuff.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index a441613a1e6c..341a3290e898 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -5539,6 +5539,23 @@ void skb_complete_tx_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(skb_complete_tx_timestamp);
+static bool skb_tstamp_tx_report_so_timestamping(struct sk_buff *skb,
+ struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *hwtstamps,
+ int tstype)
+{
+ switch (tstype) {
+ case SCM_TSTAMP_SCHED:
+ return skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_SCHED_TSTAMP;
+ case SCM_TSTAMP_SND:
+ return skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & (hwtstamps ? SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP :
+ SKBTX_SW_TSTAMP);
+ case SCM_TSTAMP_ACK:
+ return TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->txstamp_ack;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
void __skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *hwtstamps,
@@ -5551,6 +5568,9 @@ void __skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
if (!sk)
return;
+ if (!skb_tstamp_tx_report_so_timestamping(orig_skb, hwtstamps, tstype))
+ return;
+
tsflags = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags);
if (!hwtstamps && !(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW) &&
skb_shinfo(orig_skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS)
--
2.43.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-14 1:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-14 1:00 [PATCH bpf-next v11 00/12] net-timestamp: bpf extension to equip applications transparently Jason Xing
2025-02-14 1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 01/12] bpf: add networking timestamping support to bpf_get/setsockopt() Jason Xing
2025-02-14 1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 02/12] bpf: prepare the sock_ops ctx and call bpf prog for TX timestamping Jason Xing
2025-02-14 1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 03/12] bpf: prevent unsafe access to the sock fields in the BPF timestamping callback Jason Xing
2025-02-14 1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 04/12] bpf: disable unsafe helpers in TX timestamping callbacks Jason Xing
2025-02-14 1:00 ` Jason Xing [this message]
2025-02-14 1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 06/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_SCHED_OPT_CB callback Jason Xing
2025-02-14 1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 07/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_SW_OPT_CB callback Jason Xing
2025-02-14 1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 08/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_HW_OPT_CB callback Jason Xing
2025-02-15 15:06 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-15 16:20 ` Jason Xing
2025-02-15 18:08 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-15 22:23 ` Jason Xing
2025-02-15 22:58 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-15 23:10 ` Jason Xing
2025-02-16 14:36 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-16 14:45 ` Jason Xing
2025-02-16 14:48 ` Jason Xing
2025-02-16 16:17 ` Jason Xing
2025-02-18 0:56 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-18 4:51 ` Jason Xing
2025-02-18 0:55 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-14 1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 09/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_ACK_OPT_CB callback Jason Xing
2025-02-14 20:33 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-14 23:16 ` Jason Xing
2025-02-14 23:41 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-15 15:16 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-14 1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 10/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_SND_CB callback Jason Xing
2025-02-14 1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 11/12] bpf: support selective sampling for bpf timestamping Jason Xing
2025-02-15 15:10 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-15 16:17 ` Jason Xing
2025-02-15 18:01 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-15 21:11 ` Jason Xing
2025-02-14 1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 12/12] selftests/bpf: add simple bpf tests in the tx path for timestamping feature Jason Xing
2025-02-14 20:40 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-02-14 23:18 ` Jason Xing
2025-02-15 15:15 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-15 16:17 ` Jason Xing
2025-02-15 18:01 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-14 20:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v11 00/12] net-timestamp: bpf extension to equip applications transparently Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250214010038.54131-6-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--to=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).