From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11A2B17B50B; Sat, 15 Feb 2025 17:04:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739639055; cv=none; b=PsqTbsdRqzHRq0am6fOgbipqw0bvdsh+hfPlK9qsf8QUPGYizV/Q9uhGtrGXceg81EnulPF1GePerYaHoMFlm1R1tngXQ3Jgsyj6D+RKTiAvY1RL8Xz/5i0OJjTPeYwPL/UqtHBVz2livAONrxuGhJvNRu91002q4j9/ICXui+0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739639055; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WnvWKZs75WCihl2RK6XN/hRaYXzrXSYWLy9EHEla2Gw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nnkZ3NnjktvjLLgJgBFFE+bGiewX86fr1KyGz/3PZkoYEbrZWciml7OPmIhE6gjvT2gGkmssup7rvL46FKbZLxLpVho3u2fJYTLww5iMnD+fAj4kw2vZnhVywvfyuTxkibD3E+TiVjUNLg+AJk1+DVE7XeiWaGkGBYDuGiAU62M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ak36cCJG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ak36cCJG" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D17FEC4CEDF; Sat, 15 Feb 2025 17:04:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739639054; bh=WnvWKZs75WCihl2RK6XN/hRaYXzrXSYWLy9EHEla2Gw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ak36cCJGIrDMyh8JLoBwWJiYVWmf3huXTUGfoyTfnuZpGXjQ+worJ/7PW4lqmh2XY PYtsLtQ2vZoVSEl+fUHGhQdA4mmCjtF8c3nnP4011ahg5XFRhb5Mj01McFZex0Pogc GmCKwtSclIvKvylbEQDbk2qFGGpm+z53vQeHt1UxcSkuZnmGH+O7fo9SDhqnwaz9NE cIAXkIiab1/bYW7UaaWNFK/0ZVsP+pP7xcE4+MJkOcy1cIcBEJSOeRDNnbyinemZiU TRbhAUGAfr0EftL6DQgiiFtm7B4ummm5LBzhEPBOb6WkjJQCKdDDh8s9wvF3/5w06P Zy4mrHEzz8nvw== Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 09:04:12 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Eric Biggers Cc: Herbert Xu , fsverity@lists.linux.dev, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel , Sami Tolvanen , Alasdair Kergon , Mike Snitzer , Linus Torvalds , Mikulas Patocka , David Howells , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Optimize dm-verity and fsverity using multibuffer hashing Message-ID: <20250215090412.46937c11@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20250213063304.GA11664@sol.localdomain> References: <20250212154718.44255-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20250213063304.GA11664@sol.localdomain> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 22:33:04 -0800 Eric Biggers wrote: > So anyone who cares about TLS or IPsec performance should of course be using > AES-GCM, as it's the fastest by far, and it has no need for multibuffer. Can confirm, FWIW. I don't know as much about IPsec, but for TLS lightweight SW-only crypto would be ideal.