Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] dt-bindings: mfd: brcm: add gphy controller to BCM63268 sysctl

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 05:36:44PM -0800, Kyle Hendry wrote:
> Add documentation for BCM63268 gphy controller in the
> bcm63268-gpio-sysctl register range.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Hendry <kylehendrydev@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/mfd/brcm,bcm63268-gpio-sysctl.yaml     | 13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/brcm,bcm63268-gpio-sysctl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/brcm,bcm63268-gpio-sysctl.yaml
> index 9c2a04829da5..99610a5f2912 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/brcm,bcm63268-gpio-sysctl.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/brcm,bcm63268-gpio-sysctl.yaml
> @@ -50,6 +50,15 @@ patternProperties:
>        should follow the bindings specified in
>        Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,bcm63268-pinctrl.yaml.
>  
> +  "^gphy_ctrl@[0-9a-f]+$":

Read DTS coding style.

> +    # Child node
> +    type: object
> +    $ref: /schemas/mfd/syscon.yaml

No, not really... how is syscon a child of other syscon? Isn't the other
device the syscon?

This looks really fake hardware description, like recent bootlin claim that
"one register in syscon is device".

> +    description:
> +      Control register for GPHY modes. This child node definition
> +      should follow the bindings specified in
> +      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml
> +
>  required:
>    - "#address-cells"
>    - compatible
> @@ -191,4 +200,8 @@ examples:
>            pins = "dsl_gpio9";
>          };
>        };
> +      gphy_ctrl: gphy_ctrl@54 {
> +      compatible = "brcm,bcm63268-gphy-ctrl", "syscon";

Messed indentation.

Best regards,
Krzysztof