From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Purva Yeshi <purvayeshi550@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] af_unix: Fix undefined 'other' error
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:21:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250218132123.GT1615191@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bbf51850-814a-4a30-8165-625d88f221a5@stanley.mountain>
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 05:14:14PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 11:15:15AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> > So, hypothetically, Smatch could be enhanced and there wouldn't be any
> > locking warnings with this patch applied?
>
> Heh. No. What I meant to say was that none of this has anything to do
> with Smatch. This is all Sparse stuff. But also I see now that my email
> was wrong...
>
> What happened is that we changed unix_sk() and that meant Sparse couldn't
> parse the annotations and prints "error: undefined identifier 'other'".
> The error disables Sparse checking for the file.
>
> When we fix the error then the checking is enabled again. The v1 patch
> which changes the annotation is better than the v2 patch because then
> it's 9 warnings vs 11 warnings.
>
> The warnings are all false positives. All old warnings are false
> positives. And again, these are all Sparse warnings, not Smatch. Smatch
> doesn't care about annotations. Smatch has different bugs completely.
> ;)
Thanks for clarifying :)
Based on the above I'd advocate accepting the code changes in v2 [*].
And live with the warnings.
Which I think is to say that Iwashima-san was right all along.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
[*] Purva, please post a v3 that updates the commit message as per
Jakub's request elsewhere in this thread:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250212104845.2396abcf@kernel.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-18 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-10 7:50 [PATCH net-next v2] af_unix: Fix undefined 'other' error Purva Yeshi
2025-02-10 17:50 ` Joe Damato
2025-02-11 0:32 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-02-12 14:24 ` Purva Yeshi
2025-02-12 18:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-13 7:44 ` Purva Yeshi
2025-02-15 17:24 ` Simon Horman
2025-02-16 19:33 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-02-17 11:15 ` Simon Horman
2025-02-17 14:14 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-02-18 13:21 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-02-18 13:37 ` Purva Yeshi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250218132123.GT1615191@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=purvayeshi550@gmail.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).