From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12E7413DDB9; Wed, 19 Feb 2025 02:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739932390; cv=none; b=CK7QIXXNuOVcA05AnSYCmkcupBtVe+OjmiR5FMOx4urSPYOMNlO8kfSngC6wA6XiHGVsIsIduDXcnF9/D+/yMzCYRYT8qKDSDkuWK2NjPLtWoPmKvQeqy2E3pt1BBY/n7Rk5bMEVvTsJKeA+zMffs1/pTidolKBi6Ax573FqTo4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739932390; c=relaxed/simple; bh=m7BpxpXPF4VfoKYq7YsALuhmkx7N5GnIh1RNknLtAxI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Nd5GIGYY4iwhSvoQEoj9opt3ICW8oEtnov9lFMXvWXuamINGoGy7Lu5NpYHLEw+NzxT6v4SUDfbfCnsMkmDmwIR5H/9LZnlbiZJ7TINp/XQN1NGI0AmpegcqbtNthsrtWN75yYMy1EZ/MzosSf68UU3l8/oCX7RxLZhoGzzFlAc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=TnCeVXX7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TnCeVXX7" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36A6BC4CEE2; Wed, 19 Feb 2025 02:33:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739932389; bh=m7BpxpXPF4VfoKYq7YsALuhmkx7N5GnIh1RNknLtAxI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TnCeVXX7r9UonU7Le1CNQK6QDvhXxSHrstWZvgZWbq2H+f1+2MbjObMQKuw/Ksj5g P0VQZUGzvNxxANWutFMx6A8Q9XPWmCk4xWx///byPVsgh4eTHTz3V3g4M4uEgyqFNr lZG27pHHTyRNJ9R73LsYe047A5zf5YJh/wUhVc6s7Gt845r1+tZ7vQ9EUCP6S8d/Fb kevqFIQLQeZw/QXJjPdS+HNnNFqegskZ8SdQ86c/z3I41AaGnGmu4JoCc9PUTGp0Ei ZV+9g3DC0Yb834a+5aTEolG6t8J5mLWhh2YVnWoNR9TkVb05M5+InaVgonA3Oiy2FB QBqHHXxky6Slg== Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 18:33:08 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Kory Maincent Cc: Andrew Lunn , Oleksij Rempel , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: pse-pd: pd692x0: Fix power limit retrieval Message-ID: <20250218183308.5101d50c@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20250217171500.0fd4a519@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> References: <20250217134812.1925345-1-kory.maincent@bootlin.com> <20250217171500.0fd4a519@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 17:15:00 +0100 Kory Maincent wrote: > > > - return pd692x0_pi_get_pw_from_table(buf.data[2], buf.data[3]); > > > + return pd692x0_pi_get_pw_from_table(buf.data[0], buf.data[1]); > > > > Would the issue of been more obvious if some #defines were used, > > rather than magic numbers? > > We would need lots of defines as the offset of the useful data can > change between each command. Don't know if it would have been better. > > On my current patch priority series. > git grep "buf\." drivers/net/pse-pd/pd692x0.c | wc -l > 29 I guess it'd take a bigger rewrite, so I'll apply. But I fully agree with Andrew that the current coding is very error prone :( If you ever need to add more message you should start from refactoring this code..