From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28E4D192B86; Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740075505; cv=none; b=ckegTTUWR/magr0kTYk2Fyr8s8hecv56ezzw7VEHqsjkx+rnRS6GibYrx/rQZ+Qw26yH0bWvV6VItwFRlZEBND/0OMvYJda8qAVL8XvWuDj3UuFtWE7dtgeqAN07Y2ZPPJ3iSxkewt4XkxaR0c8ITgWdSRXarz797H4wxhRaPf8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740075505; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UZJ9Fyydl3UipA8lDRj3C3aMHi3OtLR1wIV8b8u2+5s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LAD4G5CnylWjh6Jc13+o7hWXkIsYZgXlykd7zV/plADehCW9ZywolTjgpWZLhOhU0gfXKnGrCFQv5WTkCsmHaEXANjSr0DvteuT1V3Xpy1P5RkwCSXI03VUg8TqM1Y0ZPogSyzu8ZyDjWAT8rJU0WSukoZOD5+yzhbd4bT2pr3s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=eZyY7/W3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="eZyY7/W3" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C028C4CED1; Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:18:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1740075504; bh=UZJ9Fyydl3UipA8lDRj3C3aMHi3OtLR1wIV8b8u2+5s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=eZyY7/W3ttlX3NgBk4VTizQWX/rJgFtt3Tlc780mRCCyW4+7Fg+9O7LUq0XSbfrIw LKWLhuPWD5Djai/6okjA5tMDtgPx5c+OHjknnLGdCv3Ptgz05tFMc1NZXu1yb4lY2b FdibA/xUOb8tjYI8i1a+uMiF2UF4hNJSbKbMp7OHbVD9FbTIJ6f93BTZpudcFJgC/k ZfEYgg7D4E6lAincpzQT1qvt729h9bYFCUfLYXJLxb8WHoZ1yPPJmhQ8431eCAGN4M fWbvOgnorxdHcX/qFae0EVZwQzBnzaJc7ekcFOpgl6msbfNyVzmzcwS+CD4LFl4SmM yAC0ZQ5bxZqCg== Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:18:23 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Sean Anderson Cc: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, pabeni@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: cadence: macb: Modernize statistics reporting Message-ID: <20250220101823.20516a77@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <561bc925-d9ad-4fe3-8a4e-18489261e531@linux.dev> References: <20250214212703.2618652-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev> <173993104298.103969.17353080742885832903.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> <12896f89-e99c-4bbc-94c1-fac89883bd92@linux.dev> <20250220085945.14961e28@kernel.org> <561bc925-d9ad-4fe3-8a4e-18489261e531@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 12:25:09 -0500 Sean Anderson wrote: > >> I think this should be deferred until v2 of [1] is applied, to make > >> backporting the fix easier. > > > > ETOOLATE :) networking trees don't rebase > > Well, I was expecting a revert and then I would resend this series once > the linked patch was applied. > > I guess I can send another patch adding locking? Assuming the fix is applied to net: Will the trees conflict? If no - will the code in net still work (just lacking lock protection)? If there is a conflict you can share a resolution with me and I'll slap it on as part of the merge.