From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next 1/3] ice: redesign dpll sma/u.fl pins control
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:13:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250220131317.GV1615191@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250207180254.549314-2-arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 07:02:52PM +0100, Arkadiusz Kubalewski wrote:
> DPLL-enabled E810 NIC driver provides user with list of input and output
> pins. Hardware internal design impacts user control over SMA and U.FL
> pins. Currently end-user view on those dpll pins doesn't provide any layer
> of abstraction. On the hardware level SMA and U.FL pins are tied together
> due to existence of direction control logic for each pair:
> - SMA1 (bi-directional) and U.FL1 (only output)
> - SMA2 (bi-directional) and U.FL2 (only input)
> The user activity on each pin of the pair may impact the state of the
> other.
>
> Previously all the pins were provided to the user as is, without the
> control over SMA pins direction.
>
> Introduce a software controlled layer of abstraction over external board
> pins, instead of providing the user with access to raw pins connected to
> the dpll:
> - new software controlled SMA and U.FL pins,
> - callback operations directing user requests to corresponding hardware
> pins according to the runtime configuration,
> - ability to control SMA pins direction.
>
> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-20 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-07 18:02 [PATCH iwl-next 0/3] ice: decouple control of SMA/U.FL/SDP pins Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2025-02-07 18:02 ` [PATCH iwl-next 1/3] ice: redesign dpll sma/u.fl pins control Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2025-02-20 13:13 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-02-07 18:02 ` [PATCH iwl-next 2/3] ice: change SMA pins to SDP in PTP API Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2025-02-20 13:13 ` Simon Horman
2025-02-07 18:02 ` [PATCH iwl-next 3/3] ice: add ice driver PTP pin documentation Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2025-02-20 13:13 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250220131317.GV1615191@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).