public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
To: claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com,
	xiaoning.wang@nxp.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: ioana.ciornei@nxp.com, yangbo.lu@nxp.com,
	michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 net 1/8] net: enetc: fix the off-by-one issue in enetc_map_tx_buffs()
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 19:12:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250224111251.1061098-2-wei.fang@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250224111251.1061098-1-wei.fang@nxp.com>

When a DMA mapping error occurs while processing skb frags, it will free
one more tx_swbd than expected, so fix this off-by-one issue.

Fixes: d4fd0404c1c9 ("enetc: Introduce basic PF and VF ENETC ethernet drivers")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Suggested-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
index 6a6fc819dfde..55ad31a5073e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
@@ -167,6 +167,24 @@ static bool enetc_skb_is_tcp(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	return skb->csum_offset == offsetof(struct tcphdr, check);
 }
 
+/**
+ * enetc_unwind_tx_frame() - Unwind the DMA mappings of a multi-buffer Tx frame
+ * @tx_ring: Pointer to the Tx ring on which the buffer descriptors are located
+ * @count: Number of Tx buffer descriptors which need to be unmapped
+ * @i: Index of the last successfully mapped Tx buffer descriptor
+ */
+static void enetc_unwind_tx_frame(struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring, int count, int i)
+{
+	while (count--) {
+		struct enetc_tx_swbd *tx_swbd = &tx_ring->tx_swbd[i];
+
+		enetc_free_tx_frame(tx_ring, tx_swbd);
+		if (i == 0)
+			i = tx_ring->bd_count;
+		i--;
+	}
+}
+
 static int enetc_map_tx_buffs(struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	bool do_vlan, do_onestep_tstamp = false, do_twostep_tstamp = false;
@@ -372,13 +390,7 @@ static int enetc_map_tx_buffs(struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring, struct sk_buff *skb)
 dma_err:
 	dev_err(tx_ring->dev, "DMA map error");
 
-	do {
-		tx_swbd = &tx_ring->tx_swbd[i];
-		enetc_free_tx_frame(tx_ring, tx_swbd);
-		if (i == 0)
-			i = tx_ring->bd_count;
-		i--;
-	} while (count--);
+	enetc_unwind_tx_frame(tx_ring, count, i);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-24 11:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-24 11:12 [PATCH v3 net 0/8] net: enetc: fix some known issues Wei Fang
2025-02-24 11:12 ` Wei Fang [this message]
2025-02-24 16:43   ` [PATCH v3 net 1/8] net: enetc: fix the off-by-one issue in enetc_map_tx_buffs() Vladimir Oltean
2025-02-24 17:24   ` Claudiu Manoil
2025-02-24 11:12 ` [PATCH v3 net 2/8] net: enetc: keep track of correct Tx BD count in enetc_map_tx_tso_buffs() Wei Fang
2025-02-24 16:44   ` Vladimir Oltean
2025-02-24 17:27   ` Claudiu Manoil
2025-02-24 11:12 ` [PATCH v3 net 3/8] net: enetc: correct the xdp_tx statistics Wei Fang
2025-02-24 11:12 ` [PATCH v3 net 4/8] net: enetc: VFs do not support HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC Wei Fang
2025-02-24 11:12 ` [PATCH v3 net 5/8] net: enetc: update UDP checksum when updating originTimestamp field Wei Fang
2025-02-24 11:12 ` [PATCH v3 net 6/8] net: enetc: add missing enetc4_link_deinit() Wei Fang
2025-02-24 11:12 ` [PATCH v3 net 7/8] net: enetc: remove the mm_lock from the ENETC v4 driver Wei Fang
2025-02-24 11:12 ` [PATCH v3 net 8/8] net: enetc: fix the off-by-one issue in enetc_map_tx_tso_buffs() Wei Fang
2025-02-24 16:47   ` Vladimir Oltean
2025-02-24 17:37   ` Claudiu Manoil
2025-02-26  3:20 ` [PATCH v3 net 0/8] net: enetc: fix some known issues patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250224111251.1061098-2-wei.fang@nxp.com \
    --to=wei.fang@nxp.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ioana.ciornei@nxp.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
    --cc=yangbo.lu@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox