From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, ricardo@marliere.net, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
dmantipov@yandex.ru, aleksander.lobakin@intel.com,
linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mrpre@163.com,
syzbot+853242d9c9917165d791@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] ppp: Fix KMSAN warning by initializing 2-byte header
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 09:32:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250225093249.GI1615191@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <rqdpj4pdxkiad7amqp7qzsrdtgy3i5beqpz7gsrjy4dwkmwg2x@3bsn7svbawic>
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 09:48:33AM +0800, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 03:27:03PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 21:31:44 +0800 Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> > > - *(u8 *)skb_push(skb, 2) = 1;
> > > + *(u16 *)skb_push(skb, 2) = 1;
> >
> > This will write the 1 to a different byte now, on big endian machines.
> > Probably doesn't matter but I doubt it's intentional?
> > --
> > pw-bot: cr
> You are correct that I assigned the value in a way that produces different
> data on big-endian and little-endian systems, although it doesn't cause
> any issues.
> I think it's better to assign it correctly according to the corresponding
> header and add more comments to avoid confusion for other developers in
> the future.
I agree correctness is good.
Perhaps I am over-thinking things, but does the following approach
achieve both of the following?
a) Initialise both bytes.
b) Place the 1 consistently on both big and little endian hosts,
as is the case without this patch (which I assume is correct).
*(__be16 *)skb_push(skb, 2) = cpu_to_be16(1);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-25 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-18 13:31 [PATCH net-next v1 0/1] ppp: Fix KMSAN uninit-value warning Jiayuan Chen
2025-02-18 13:31 ` [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] ppp: Fix KMSAN warning by initializing 2-byte header Jiayuan Chen
2025-02-20 23:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-21 1:48 ` Jiayuan Chen
2025-02-25 9:32 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250225093249.GI1615191@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dmantipov@yandex.ru \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mrpre@163.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=ricardo@marliere.net \
--cc=syzbot+853242d9c9917165d791@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).