From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D88EC22F177; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.227.15.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740663777; cv=none; b=rt1DhlsuSq6b4hLTeRRqlxEvoP5fDLytrqR0r5Ugg4Nuwm7QRAlX8sx1NLeBtz/AU3O82OlGSrULfPORPjvt6Wct/zwAjTu534/5vRds75LyXZsSdLAt6S/5+Qgs+lCw4dsgvQ/zPaiveaX9VDrQkbr16Z3QLJhJGB+GPQ5W7SE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740663777; c=relaxed/simple; bh=riiiXkoDRvE48j0agmwVCiNuVc3bnAzwfJ9sDlQrhkU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ioz5DftqLcjqoYzYFGYsQSiJrw4rLF/SHy0P99xsP+n4sYeW5503yTYeMRPG8X11UB4lEnNRFXsvySLQ212Hq+Ro7OPJPIc0mFW+558m7ACMcj09UqNoWI8pk27Ct0xzKIFKc2Ip3nntMCXxvbF0oSeoTOb5aa+9coc6/9QlEG4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=gmx.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmx.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmx.net header.i=ps.report@gmx.net header.b=LwEUZPKp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.227.15.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=gmx.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmx.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmx.net header.i=ps.report@gmx.net header.b="LwEUZPKp" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmx.net; s=s31663417; t=1740663766; x=1741268566; i=ps.report@gmx.net; bh=riiiXkoDRvE48j0agmwVCiNuVc3bnAzwfJ9sDlQrhkU=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:cc: content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id: mime-version:reply-to:subject:to; b=LwEUZPKp16ey/JhfbdX7rVNG7RevUp/6qrJVf432XaarOiRZQ255NBOdmHM5NPyd h6izrnTNBNg7iIuMTjAfm/vkGe0y9juO4R3GEds7TAGnolT766gOFwdLKqxKEgxeR KiSmUTreUp+ckjVaYAy6QUojFQSRiE/5uOEirH4UelrwdhkrX1keHaiCvtK9peVEU bK78uYRudK3EBBNBmauzCGE98E5fWS/G51TTSr6cu9rMx5bKZ/nw3KGQAZstULjJI Zp5i5LHuvNO6YdIhTK+Ph7LjM99Ms9/4Gxz1fDAg9wFR+irNu37VFlqzeFrBPAZak k48VJfKPa2cUmTjIWA== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Received: from localhost ([82.135.81.151]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MPGW7-1tdxtr04Hl-00S1SZ; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 14:42:46 +0100 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 14:42:43 +0100 From: Peter Seiderer To: Paolo Abeni Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Simon Horman , Shuah Khan , Thomas Gleixner , Artem Chernyshev , Frederic Weisbecker , Nam Cao Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 4/8] net: pktgen: fix mpls maximum labels list parsing Message-ID: <20250227144243.6953f14e@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20250224092242.13192-1-ps.report@gmx.net> <20250224092242.13192-5-ps.report@gmx.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.48; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:yCmN0tzwMYCyh7IloeH9BsWmZLeaCd3Y/OD8EmO4xS7g/1Lfquc 2jeVNSAp88WQ+zWU4BxTm7NWN7q+WTF8k04bPVDhrOTH3y795Sv5DiEDa72N2xyqaQttYwC DNL0WNBayo1+b3gonTLecBA7oplVGnIgV1r4nSnIIaG1+9z8MKLj2PJD7/FIkwViV52Z/sN rKKm/1oKgrtGZZrPEhHOw== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:NwqR4tfaEww=;hKi3n6DMSwzCKMS2pz22cXcYYJE gT+PrLJ4MpmU4BUsqQIkBQvKEAZ70I+w2l1YKtdezisbMckEK/FQ97fTFUqES/+o6LcVbOXxs VTo9dzDEhtlkK71FIGpv+YH0oqJ1eZOnpATPifNSftiWD95HPVq7ALbpl5xX336dBe1kVHesD crZynMAdAeXxtzGDjZ92Aa7o4112AyOSUR/63W5eBm4Iqh4VkwARw+gT36XlKjW+As0jssQsp 9uCGIRD95CEoil+f3sH3H0pKoEJbrezV0xSXYIDUg6yGvhULsrsTRaUSxAeFqPmplbKr37bDI oX89fPgyZEdaVRnN3ccpnHurzTFerTCCQ7pqZjmhEO6zlG1a0z2oSmFKVTJsO/jpOsaARcTUF EAdDTif4iIRcZX6ha+RNHakEy3Bm0BvYjjebUc1PXPWZoQm9xCt9fQifhl5UZEMtqyGk1gZu5 5PRUXEQ+dJMbmIejlnM55LwWrtAK8clcCwLS7AJFQOmKTSa7yjhz8RquaAQqKp1oMl2AZFjaK GJYW1E4mBLoJ76yZ0kw8i4zsQXk2NG8/zaUahW5nnEkU2zzZ3wQAMp+C1tOj0nnXczV+9l+Hh 2OQhWN8lQkS8HD/yZFfYDPSlKaFlU68RsegfSH+VgIJATa2KI88fdK6OwgnwzyjGhMBBwSVZ2 UJdurc3HWxhlhWty4zBwRLQnEOd59du9uO5af7AbPvlGF71ODKRSOJ0it3LnIedHfXt/tzkYF 76jFCkVP5C2lpDmslT9hecq8Vo1ZfhJDsMteW6PnAXOg7XUpZx35LcflFfY4XSFrxLAZifl2y NuwnhwAmQho/MUbOLe1j3y729OFFKo5TsY9maTc3jn4d3KxbI3VkO+hH7Z/H2uHUgEfbCUw0r MjkoNyJUWqjPIGMnsck24/sUmo+rRluwuhK+hhqW4WsqAA93wrLcpsAP96GgnmBAdfFaEBUKr 7wNaMfYKmdK/yXfK6asq979tv+PF0rf4eLnpjG58wo21bDD4Ubdgu86fKh/JJrvVcjQBA2bRF HoCQnla89N1cLXPGFNgm5he71JNy73Edq0euomOaEXjEOWnK87lC97TlmWVDiO0IW+dTqhs0O keSulSnDkgl+Vd+dlnRhrenXyemkwDF5K2QmBMuTd0ymbqdU2sIAM9L3a1UW7r2UBOBA3p6Fi m3mv5I6hDXErX+2jYECAv29w969uG/UcXUN8zdNoQ4kxormDeRIdGC5NHXnhXaciF5NnjPQld P0hWKl/L/OYO42aTGckYdnDLKH7LjpKy8bN036DUcsIzYb+fk80+BaQIxmDpxlbCvAKg2hXVF vb88SxNBnFAh1acmhT8VgE5wA1vRo+xuj8HTLokSjpdXwjNoESKHXbhQr0dXr3sf124Qq2/iC p3Bp0xnfhZseTQh4/L4VExNEu88HlmSLuTWSyGBcJ8ossYN+WGGLDjm8ai Hello Paolo, On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 11:24:48 +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote: > On 2/24/25 10:22 AM, Peter Seiderer wrote: > > Fix mpls maximum labels list parsing up to MAX_MPLS_LABELS/16 entries > > (instead of up to MAX_MPLS_LABELS - 1). > > Very minor nit... > > The above comments sounds misleading to me. I read it as the new limit > is MAX_MPLS_LABELS divided by 16, that is 1. O.k, will rephrase on next patch iteration, thanks for review! Regards, Peter > > Thanks, > > Paolo >