From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A699286359; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 01:54:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741053240; cv=none; b=S9S5x4eR5Le/cGiKkN1o1er0kykEKt1Ccp5Apv/4bHtKMdITk3B83hlJcPT5+WOQGzgy6/3L43wv4oOINADgP+J94BDmeogaDKvVeAoFxbhfFFoMMIcioObYvOPHOUAq9VnkCru017DJglwV7Tq8jP74MaqBIVupRZvnKCHrjq4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741053240; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vOBtcO7BUDYYfaSWV47VlqyBHkJCqACzFydEcJw2Ntk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AHAHV9tIrJgfLu6UHnPco/qn3ff3XhSDopDuZO2wQWGD68jWp7pjapGWU2Onb5+AMAFlil6UBZRlTg2lI3MOZMVVRMwIpz3l+TzdrhIANQskR7j9HSqL/0TKTepq78tYXG3mlgD0N6ilvuZFAUHKrhVyNOIeHuEzl24fVeEAip4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UuQy3rXN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UuQy3rXN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84FE6C4CEE4; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 01:53:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1741053240; bh=vOBtcO7BUDYYfaSWV47VlqyBHkJCqACzFydEcJw2Ntk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UuQy3rXNDuM/qY9D81GwMkmmunQH0flv8m+4EvTB3KTAdDCb99wwcI2B28/AtxbSU SlN5YCHjymEmrYY3AhCUEf8JeAwGQMm9AvI/WK3VW5Tw8wQ6vFigZl4b6qcMXqb0dk 9lbMkX8c4ofgl4znJu9Fu0ACRfQrsFfkmRhOos7CV5qZzBm2Btqq6CLg6ONPE579Bh parZfI56L3XGiWo5VYRgd77vmxSz4eUql4mMdW07W1xGv2EQ18cVuRz0llMT++VVWs UDvCciSuL84WcI54cdt1+T/LtQCgnRxss53awyi0wlo63mWJ4X8fGS1GlWtglm8ieV tMxHq+NllyLZg== Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 17:53:58 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jason Gunthorpe , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Andy Gospodarek , Aron Silverton , Dan Williams , Daniel Vetter , Dave Jiang , David Ahern , Christoph Hellwig , Itay Avraham , Jiri Pirko , Jonathan Cameron , Leonid Bloch , Leon Romanovsky , linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed , "Nelson, Shannon" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] Introduce fwctl subystem Message-ID: <20250303175358.4e9e0f78@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <0-v5-642aa0c94070+4447f-fwctl_jgg@nvidia.com> References: <0-v5-642aa0c94070+4447f-fwctl_jgg@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 20:26:28 -0400 Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > v5: > - Move hunks between patches to make more sense > - Rename ucmd_buffer to fwctl_ucmd_buffer > - Update comments and commit messages > - Copyright to 2025 > - Drop bxnt WIP patches > - Allow a NULL ops->info > - Decode more op codes for mlx5 and the sub-operation for > MLX5_CMD_OP_ACCESS_REG/_USER Did you address my feedback? I asked for the mlx5 support to only be enabled in RDMA is in use. Saeed who wrote the mlx5 parts of this patchset clearly admitted on v4: As explained above, netdev doesn't need it https://lore.kernel.org/all/Z6ZsOMLq7tt3ijX_@x130/ Greg, I've been asking for this interface to be scoped to when RDMA (/CXL/storage) is in enabled on these NICs since pretty much the first RFC. Do I need to keep responding?